Compare Stocks › GEV vs PFE

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GEV is undervalued at $858, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1449 and a margin of safety of 41%. PFE is overvalued at $31, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. Of the two, GEV has the wider margin of safety.

GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
$857.87
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52

Rewards

GEV
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $12.30 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★FCF yield of 9.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.5x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

GEV
  • ⚠Gross margin of 21.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GEV
PFE
Valuation
$22.10B
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
9.73%
FCF Yield
7.18%
22.52
Trailing P/E
40.16
33.14
Forward P/E
10.57
Quality & Moat
27.27%
ROIC
9.42%
93.04%
ROE
5.01%
21.79%
Gross Margin
74.72%
1.68
PEG Ratio
13.98
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.50
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
0.23%
Dividend Yield
5.64%
GEV: 8Ties: 1PFE: 3
GEVPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GEV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GEV
$18.55
created per $1 retained over 1 year
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$85.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GEV
40.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 40.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $857.87
Fair Value: $1449.22
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GEV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $858?

+18.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.3%
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GEV
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GEV
-2.20
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GEV
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.1%Retail & Other 17.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,234
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GEV
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GEV
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.54M
ABATE VICTOR
Officer
$4.57M
@ $948.08 · 2026-06-01
POTVIN MATTHEW JOSEPH
Officer
$2.47M
@ $1059.09 · 2026-05-14
BAERT STEVEN
Officer
$4.50M
@ $850.00 · 2026-03-03
PARKS KENNETH SCOTT
Chief Financial Officer
$2.05M
@ $620.00 · 2025-08-26
ZINGONI MARIA VICTORIA
Officer
$6.92M
@ $368.16 · 2025-04-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GEV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GEV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View GEV Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GEV vs PFE

Is GE Vernova Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GEV trades at a 40.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1449 vs. price $858), compared to PFE's -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, GE Vernova Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

GEV scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GEV scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, GE Vernova Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) generates a 9.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Pfizer Inc.'s 7.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, GE Vernova Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

GEV earns 27.3% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, GE Vernova Inc.'s or Pfizer Inc.'s?▼

GEV's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). GEV has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

GEV vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io