Compare StocksGEHC vs PFE

GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GEHC is undervalued at $68, with a DCF intrinsic value of $98 and a margin of safety of 31%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

GEHC
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
$68.02
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

GEHC
  • GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • 5 insider purchases totaling $5.9M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

GEHC
  • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GEHC
PFE
Valuation
$1.57B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
5.12%
FCF Yield
N/A
15.67
Trailing P/E
19.09
12.59
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
11.56%
ROIC
10.19%
19.38%
ROE
8.31%
39.53%
Gross Margin
74.80%
1.88
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
0.75
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.36
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
0.21%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
GEHC: 4Ties: 1PFE: 6
GEHCPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GEHC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GEHC
$1.98
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.49B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.87B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GEHC
30.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 30.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $68.02
Fair Value: $97.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GEHC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $68?

+6.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.7%

The market implies +6.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GEHC
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GEHC
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GEHC
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 93.4%Retail & Other 6.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,715
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GEHC
5
Buys (3M)
8
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.42M
LOBO KEVIN A
Director
$641,800
@ $64.18 · 2026-05-22
HOCHMAN RODNEY F
Director
$100,365
@ $62.03 · 2026-05-12
YANG WATKIN PHOEBE L
Director
$63,006
@ $63.01 · 2026-05-08
CULP HENRY LAWRENCE JR.
Director
$5.00M
@ $61.88 · 2026-05-06
STROMBERG WILLIAM J
Director
$61,689
@ $61.69 · 2026-05-06
SACCARO JAMES
Chief Financial Officer
$200,585
@ $60.60 · 2026-05-01
ARDUINI PETER J
Chief Executive Officer
$249,827
@ $59.92 · 2026-04-30
JIMENEZ FRANK R
General Counsel
$105,788
@ $60.45 · 2026-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GEHC
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
NEWCOMB GEORGE A.
Officer
$185,080
@ $92.54 · 2025-02-18
ROTT ROLAND
Officer
$309,339
@ $86.48 · 2024-11-06
RACKLIFFE PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$78,867
@ $87.63 · 2024-11-05
STACHERSKI KENNETH ROBERT
Officer
$1.58M
@ $83.22 · 2024-08-14
WESTRICK THOMAS J
Officer
$222,145
@ $80.78 · 2024-08-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GEHC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GEHC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View GEHC Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GEHC vs PFE

Is GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to GEHC's 30.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $98 vs. $68).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. or Pfizer, Inc.?

GEHC scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer, Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GEHC scores 2.0 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. or Pfizer, Inc.?

GEHC earns 11.6% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s or Pfizer, Inc.'s?

GEHC's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). GEHC has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.