Compare StocksGD vs JPM

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GD is overvalued at $383, with a DCF intrinsic value of $339 and a margin of safety of -13%. JPM is undervalued at $352, with an intrinsic value of $1411518993158 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

GD
General Dynamics Corporation
$383.42
VS
JPM
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
$351.79

Rewards

GD
  • General Dynamics Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • General Dynamics Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.35 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
JPM
  • JP Morgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

GD
  • Gross margin of 15.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $27.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
JPM
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.17 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $8.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GD
JPM
Valuation
$4.40B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
4.24%
FCF Yield
N/A
23.37
Trailing P/E
15.09
20.79
Forward P/E
14.19
Quality & Moat
12.39%
ROIC
5.56%
17.80%
ROE
17.79%
15.38%
Gross Margin
0.00%
2.66
PEG Ratio
1.72
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.78
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.66%
Dividend Yield
1.71%
GD: 2Ties: 3JPM: 3
GDJPM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JPM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GD
$3.40
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.76B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.95B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JPM
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$188.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GD
13.1% Overvalued
Price is 13.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $383.42
Fair Value: $338.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $351.79
Fair Value: $1411518993157.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $383?

+11.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.6%

The market implies +11.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

JPM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GD
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JPM
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GD
-2.64
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GD
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 11.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,609
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 76.2%Retail & Other 23.5%
No. of Institutional Holders6,289
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GD
2
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $116.05M
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$2.00M
@ $365.00 · 2026-06-17
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$25.04M
@ $344.39 · 2026-05-12
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$11.66M
@ $354.09 · 2026-03-11
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$1.35M
@ $353.50 · 2026-03-11
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$3.60M
@ $354.95 · 2026-03-11
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$1.32M
@ $354.35 · 2026-03-11
RAYHA MARK
Officer
$1.52M
@ $348.79 · 2026-02-13
PADDOCK DAVID
Officer
$6.82M
@ $334.92 · 2025-12-17
RAYHA MARK
Officer
$33,990
@ $339.90 · 2025-11-20
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$1.06M
@ $329.45 · 2025-09-12
BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
Officer
$2.62M
@ $321.17 · 2025-08-25
MALCOLM MARK
Director
$386,038
@ $319.04 · 2025-08-22
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$40.48M
@ $313.57 · 2025-08-18
MOSS WILLIAM A.
Officer
$5.60M
@ $316.40 · 2025-08-14
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$10.63M
@ $315.20 · 2025-08-08
PADDOCK DAVID
Officer
$1.93M
@ $312.26 · 2025-08-04
DE LEON RUDY F
Director
$1.72M
@ $312.81 · 2025-07-28
BURNS MARK LAGRAND
Officer
$23.92M
@ $312.99 · 2025-07-28
WALL PETER A.
Director
$710,038
@ $312.79 · 2025-07-25
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$52.77M
@ $283.02 · 2025-06-16
GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
General Counsel
$12.00M
@ $284.16 · 2025-06-13
GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
Officer
$7.50M
@ $272.11 · 2025-03-10
NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
Chief Executive Officer
$8.61M
@ $263.48 · 2025-03-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
5
Sells (3M)
30
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $97.63M
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.81M
@ $330.73 · 2026-06-22
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$1.64M
@ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.98M
@ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.70M
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$949,658
@ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.52M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$935,032
@ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.26M
@ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.80M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$1.72M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.32M
@ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.78M
@ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.74M
@ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$970,660
@ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$40.00M
@ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$127,761
@ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GD
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
JPM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View GD Full AnalysisView JPM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GD vs JPM

Is General Dynamics Corporation or JP Morgan Chase & Co. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1411518993158 vs. price $352), compared to GD's -13.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $339 vs. $383).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, General Dynamics Corporation or JP Morgan Chase & Co.?

GD scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while JPM scores 90/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is JP Morgan Chase & Co. in financial distress?

JPM's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GD scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, General Dynamics Corporation or JP Morgan Chase & Co.?

GD earns 12.4% ROIC versus JPM's 5.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, General Dynamics Corporation's or JP Morgan Chase & Co.'s?

GD's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to JPM's 76/100 (Safe). GD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.