Compare StocksGD vs INTC

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

GD
General Dynamics Corporation
$349.63
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

GD
  • General Dynamics Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • General Dynamics Corporation scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.40 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    GD
    • Gross margin of 15.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • PEG ratio of 56.57 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $19.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GD
    INTC
    Valuation
    $3.36B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    3.55%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    22.63
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    19.35
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    11.89%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    16.43%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    15.13%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    56.57
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.38
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.74%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    GD: 5Ties: 2INTC: 2
    GDINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GD
    $3.40
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.76B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$22.95B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GD
    5.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 5.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $349.63
    Fair Value: $368.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $350?

    +10.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.4%

    The market implies +10.3% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +13.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GD
    93/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GD
    -2.64
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GD
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 87.3%Retail & Other 12.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,542
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GD
    5
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $180.13M
    NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $354.09 · 2026-03-11
    GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
    General Counsel
    $1.32M
    @ $354.35 · 2026-03-11
    GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $353.50 · 2026-03-11
    BURNS MARK LAGRAND
    Officer
    $3.60M
    @ $354.95 · 2026-03-11
    RAYHA MARK
    Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $348.79 · 2026-02-13
    PADDOCK DAVID
    Officer
    $6.82M
    @ $334.92 · 2025-12-17
    RAYHA MARK
    Officer
    $33,990
    @ $339.90 · 2025-11-20
    MALCOLM MARK
    Director
    $1.06M
    @ $329.45 · 2025-09-12
    BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
    Officer
    $2.62M
    @ $321.17 · 2025-08-25
    MALCOLM MARK
    Director
    $386,038
    @ $319.04 · 2025-08-22
    NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.48M
    @ $313.57 · 2025-08-18
    MOSS WILLIAM A.
    Officer
    $5.60M
    @ $316.40 · 2025-08-14
    GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
    Officer
    $10.63M
    @ $315.20 · 2025-08-08
    PADDOCK DAVID
    Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $312.26 · 2025-08-04
    DE LEON RUDY F
    Director
    $1.72M
    @ $312.81 · 2025-07-28
    BURNS MARK LAGRAND
    Officer
    $23.92M
    @ $312.99 · 2025-07-28
    WALL PETER A.
    Director
    $710,038
    @ $312.79 · 2025-07-25
    NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $52.77M
    @ $283.02 · 2025-06-16
    GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
    General Counsel
    $12.00M
    @ $284.16 · 2025-06-13
    GILLILAND MARGUERITE AMY
    Officer
    $7.50M
    @ $272.11 · 2025-03-10
    NOVAKOVIC PHEBE N
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.61M
    @ $263.48 · 2025-03-05
    GALLOPOULOS GREGORY S
    General Counsel
    $930,926
    @ $263.42 · 2025-03-05
    SCHUMACHER LAURA J
    Director
    $459,205
    @ $255.68 · 2025-01-31
    BRADY CHRISTOPHER J.
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $280.91 · 2024-11-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GD
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View GD Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis