SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › FTV vs PFE

Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

FTV
Fortive Corporation
$55.55
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41

Rewards

FTV
  • ★Gross margin of 63.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

FTV
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.11 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 34.9x is 39% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
FTV
PFE
Valuation
$855.86M
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
4.85%
FCF Yield
8.61%
34.94
Trailing P/E
20.15
17.43
Forward P/E
9.69
Quality & Moat
6.77%
ROIC
7.67%
8.24%
ROE
8.96%
63.50%
Gross Margin
75.81%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.51
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.53
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
0.47%
Dividend Yield
6.28%
FTV: 1Ties: 1PFE: 9
FTVPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
FTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
FTV
$0.11
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.97B
Δ Market Cap
+$216.3M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
FTV
89.8% Overvalued
Price is 89.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $55.55
Fair Value: $29.27
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
FTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $56?

+15.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.2%

The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
FTV
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
FTV
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
FTV
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 108.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,126
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
FTV
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00M
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2025-12-26
OKERSTROM MARK D
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $47.03 · 2025-08-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
FTV
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.24M
MITCHELL KATE D
Director
$416,023
@ $58.34 · 2026-02-18
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$2.98M
@ $51.28 · 2025-11-10
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$110,367
@ $50.35 · 2025-10-31
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$12.67M
@ $72.40 · 2025-05-15
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$1.06M
@ $73.88 · 2025-05-12
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.53M
@ $78.86 · 2025-02-28
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$237,308
@ $79.05 · 2025-02-28
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$457,998
@ $80.52 · 2025-02-26
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $80.38 · 2025-02-24
UNDERWOOD PETER C
General Counsel
$382,900
@ $76.58 · 2024-11-11
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$12.32M
@ $71.71 · 2024-11-01
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$508,142
@ $74.03 · 2024-09-13
SCHWARZ JONATHAN L.
Officer
$1.05M
@ $73.80 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
FTV
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
FTV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View FTV Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis