Compare StocksFTV vs INTC

Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

FTV
Fortive Corporation
$55.55
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

FTV
  • Gross margin of 63.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
INTC

    Risks

    FTV
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.11 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Trailing P/E of 34.9x is 39% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FTV
    INTC
    Valuation
    $855.86M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    4.85%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    34.94
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    17.43
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    6.77%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    8.24%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    63.50%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.51
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.53
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    0.47%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    FTV: 6Ties: 1INTC: 2
    FTVINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FTV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FTV
    $0.11
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $1.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$216.3M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FTV
    89.8% Overvalued
    Price is 89.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $55.55
    Fair Value: $29.27
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FTV

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $56?

    +15.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.2%

    The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FTV
    52/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FTV
    -3.04
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FTV
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 108.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,126
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FTV
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.00M
    LASSITER WRIGHT III
    Director
    $257.00
    @ $64.25 · 2025-12-26
    OKERSTROM MARK D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $47.03 · 2025-08-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FTV
    1
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17.24M
    MITCHELL KATE D
    Director
    $416,023
    @ $58.34 · 2026-02-18
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    Officer
    $2.98M
    @ $51.28 · 2025-11-10
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $110,367
    @ $50.35 · 2025-10-31
    LICO JAMES A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.67M
    @ $72.40 · 2025-05-15
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $73.88 · 2025-05-12
    MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $78.86 · 2025-02-28
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $237,308
    @ $79.05 · 2025-02-28
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $457,998
    @ $80.52 · 2025-02-26
    LICO JAMES A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $15.76M
    @ $80.38 · 2025-02-24
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    General Counsel
    $382,900
    @ $76.58 · 2024-11-11
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $12.32M
    @ $71.71 · 2024-11-01
    MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $508,142
    @ $74.03 · 2024-09-13
    SCHWARZ JONATHAN L.
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $73.80 · 2024-09-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FTV
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FTV
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View FTV Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io