Compare Stocks › FTV vs GOOGL

Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, FTV is overvalued at $65, with a DCF intrinsic value of $28 and a margin of safety of -137%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, FTV has the wider margin of safety.

FTV
Fortive Corporation
$65.23
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

FTV
  • ★Gross margin of 63.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.98 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

FTV
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FTV
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $982.92M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    5.06%
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    30.91
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    19.67
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    7.74%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    10.55%
    ROE
    44.29%
    63.47%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.54
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.45
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    0.43%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    FTV: 3Ties: 3GOOGL: 6
    FTVGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FTV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FTV
    $0.11
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $1.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$216.3M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FTV
    136.5% Overvalued
    Price is 136.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $65.23
    Fair Value: $27.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FTV

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $65?

    +16.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.6%

    The market implies +16.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FTV
    49/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FTV
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FTV
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 114.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FTV
    1
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1,071
    LASSITER WRIGHT III
    Director
    $300.00
    @ $60.00 · 2026-09-25
    LASSITER WRIGHT III
    Director
    $257.00
    @ $64.25 · 2026-07-02
    LASSITER WRIGHT III
    Director
    $257.00
    @ $64.25 · 2026-03-26
    LASSITER WRIGHT III
    Director
    $257.00
    @ $64.25 · 2025-12-26
    OKERSTROM MARK D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $47.03 · 2025-08-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FTV
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.82M
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    Officer
    $533,493
    @ $61.59 · 2026-08-10
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    Officer
    $2.89M
    @ $60.81 · 2026-05-04
    MITCHELL KATE D
    Director
    $416,023
    @ $58.34 · 2026-02-18
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    Officer
    $2.98M
    @ $51.28 · 2025-11-10
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $110,367
    @ $50.35 · 2025-10-31
    LICO JAMES A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.67M
    @ $72.40 · 2025-05-15
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $73.88 · 2025-05-12
    MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $78.86 · 2025-02-28
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $237,308
    @ $79.05 · 2025-02-28
    WALKER STACEY A.
    Officer
    $457,998
    @ $80.52 · 2025-02-26
    LICO JAMES A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $15.76M
    @ $80.38 · 2025-02-24
    UNDERWOOD PETER C
    General Counsel
    $382,900
    @ $76.58 · 2024-11-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FTV
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FTV
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View FTV Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: FTV vs GOOGL

    Is Fortive Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, FTV trades at a -136.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $28 vs. price $65), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Fortive Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while FTV scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FTV scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Fortive Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    Fortive Corporation (FTV) generates a 5.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Fortive Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus FTV's 7.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Fortive Corporation's or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to FTV's 85/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.