Compare StocksFIX vs GOOGL

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, FIX is overvalued at $1967, with a DCF intrinsic value of $1567 and a margin of safety of -26%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, FIX has the wider margin of safety.

FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
$1967.41
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

FIX
  • Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Comfort Systems USA, Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 59.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

FIX
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 56.8x is 125% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
FIX
GOOGL
Valuation
$1.10B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
1.59%
FCF Yield
1.63%
56.81
Trailing P/E
28.09
36.81
Forward P/E
25.39
Quality & Moat
64.95%
ROIC
20.98%
53.29%
ROE
38.88%
25.13%
Gross Margin
60.37%
0.93
PEG Ratio
1.45
Balance Sheet Safety
0.35
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.13
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
0.13%
Dividend Yield
0.24%
FIX: 3Ties: 2GOOGL: 7
FIXGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
FIX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
FIX
$16.63
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.73B
Δ Market Cap
+$28.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
FIX
25.6% Overvalued
Price is 25.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1967.41
Fair Value: $1566.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
FIX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1967?

+24.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +23.4%

The market implies +24.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +23.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
FIX
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
FIX
-2.40
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
FIX
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 96.5%Retail & Other 2.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,641
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,266
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
FIX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
FIX
7
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $153.27M
HARDY RHOMAN J
Director
$649,827
@ $1900.08 · 2026-05-27
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$9.81M
@ $1962.73 · 2026-05-11
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$2.25M
@ $2000.37 · 2026-05-11
MYERS FRANKLIN
Director
$8.56M
@ $1902.57 · 2026-05-07
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$21.89M
@ $1969.84 · 2026-05-05
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$889,890
@ $1779.78 · 2026-04-30
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$2.60M
@ $1732.67 · 2026-04-29
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$3.16M
@ $1382.15 · 2026-03-03
REED TERRENCE M
Officer
$2.54M
@ $1419.80 · 2026-03-03
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$6.16M
@ $1369.74 · 2026-03-03
MYERS FRANKLIN
Director
$12.72M
@ $1472.56 · 2026-02-25
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$13.61M
@ $1453.12 · 2026-02-25
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$3.61M
@ $1443.32 · 2026-02-24
SKIDMORE CONSTANCE ELLEN
Director
$1.43M
@ $1425.00 · 2026-02-24
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$12.91M
@ $1434.97 · 2026-02-23
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$702,500
@ $1405.00 · 2026-02-23
HOWELL LAURA FINLEY
General Counsel
$996,163
@ $996.16 · 2025-12-04
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$4.19M
@ $958.88 · 2025-12-01
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.79M
@ $947.98 · 2025-11-24
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$3.83M
@ $958.72 · 2025-10-31
MYERS FRANKLIN
Director
$5.03M
@ $1006.68 · 2025-10-29
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$2.51M
@ $1005.41 · 2025-10-29
BULLS HERMAN E
Director
$2.03M
@ $1013.62 · 2025-10-29
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$1.08M
@ $721.89 · 2025-09-10
BULLS HERMAN E
Director
$2.13M
@ $710.00 · 2025-08-27
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$482,702
@ $689.57 · 2025-08-25
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$750,159
@ $695.88 · 2025-08-22
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$964,460
@ $704.50 · 2025-08-12
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$5.84M
@ $692.60 · 2025-08-08
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.92M
@ $691.74 · 2025-08-07
MYERS FRANKLIN
Chairman of the Board
$3.08M
@ $683.57 · 2025-08-06
MCKENNA TRENT TIMOTHY
Chief Operating Officer
$3.15M
@ $716.63 · 2025-07-31
BULLS HERMAN E
Director
$1.25M
@ $500.01 · 2025-06-09
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$4.05M
@ $506.82 · 2025-06-06
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$5.88M
@ $470.11 · 2025-05-13
SKIDMORE CONSTANCE ELLEN
Director
$452,980
@ $452.98 · 2025-05-12
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.47M
@ $431.66 · 2025-05-07
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$1.29M
@ $431.66 · 2025-05-07
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$784,980
@ $436.10 · 2025-05-05
MCKENNA TRENT TIMOTHY
Chief Operating Officer
$1.94M
@ $484.81 · 2024-11-22
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.73M
@ $448.88 · 2024-11-13
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$2.50M
@ $459.72 · 2024-11-08
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$1.02M
@ $409.46 · 2024-11-05
MYERS FRANKLIN
Chairman of the Board
$4.68M
@ $390.18 · 2024-10-30
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$814,881
@ $351.85 · 2024-08-29
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$1.19M
@ $336.19 · 2024-08-27
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $332.16 · 2024-08-20
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$4.94M
@ $329.55 · 2024-08-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
FIX
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
FIX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View FIX Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: FIX vs GOOGL

Is Comfort Systems USA, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, FIX trades at a -25.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1567 vs. price $1967), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while FIX scores 82/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FIX scores 7.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

FIX earns 65.0% ROIC versus GOOGL's 21.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s or Alphabet Inc.'s?

FIX's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). FIX has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.