Compare StocksFITB vs INTC

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, FITB is undervalued at $53, with a DCF intrinsic value of $103 and a margin of safety of 49%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, FITB has the wider margin of safety.

FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
$52.74
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Rewards

FITB
  • Fifth Third Bancorp scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
INTC

    Risks

    FITB
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.22 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Trailing P/E of 17.8x is 51% above the historical average of 11.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FITB
    INTC
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -1.23%
    17.76
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    10.73
    Forward P/E
    86.70
    Quality & Moat
    2.40%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    7.97%
    ROE
    -2.91%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.95
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.10
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    2.99%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    FITB: 4Ties: 1INTC: 2
    FITBINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FITB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FITB
    $2.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.79B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$8.53B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FITB
    48.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 48.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $52.74
    Fair Value: $102.69
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FITB

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FITB
    84/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FITB
    -2.41
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FITB
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 91.3%Retail & Other 8.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,582
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FITB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $123,650
    BAYH B EVAN III
    Director
    $123,650
    @ $41.22 · 2025-10-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FITB
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.96M
    SEFZIK PETER L
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $50.46 · 2026-04-28
    KHANNA KEVIN J
    Officer
    $304,630
    @ $50.77 · 2026-04-20
    SCHRAMM JUDE
    Chief Technology Officer
    $757,515
    @ $50.85 · 2026-02-24
    SPENCE TIMOTHY
    Chief Executive Officer
    $184,868
    @ $54.05 · 2026-02-18
    SCHRAMM JUDE
    Chief Technology Officer
    $109,125
    @ $48.50 · 2025-12-11
    KHANNA KEVIN J
    Officer
    $597,426
    @ $42.67 · 2025-08-15
    LAVENDER KEVIN P
    Officer
    $945,100
    @ $43.55 · 2025-02-20
    GIBSON KALA
    Officer
    $392,712
    @ $43.64 · 2025-02-20
    LEONARD JAMES C
    Chief Operating Officer
    $761,279
    @ $44.26 · 2025-02-19
    SPENCE TIMOTHY
    Chief Executive Officer
    $346,979
    @ $44.10 · 2025-02-18
    SHAFFER ROBERT P
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $48.65 · 2024-11-25
    GARRETT KRISTINE R
    Officer
    $327,526
    @ $43.67 · 2024-10-28
    GARRETT KRISTINE R
    Officer
    $296,213
    @ $41.72 · 2024-09-09
    SCHRAMM JUDE
    Chief Technology Officer
    $840,055
    @ $42.00 · 2024-08-26
    LAVENDER KEVIN P
    Officer
    $835,369
    @ $41.77 · 2024-07-24
    ZAUNBRECHER SUSAN B
    Officer
    $117,119
    @ $41.21 · 2024-07-24
    SCHRAMM JUDE
    Chief Technology Officer
    $100,000
    @ $40.00 · 2024-07-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FITB
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FITB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View FITB Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: FITB vs INTC

    Is Fifth Third Bancorp or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, FITB trades at a 48.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $103 vs. price $53), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Fifth Third Bancorp or Intel Corporation?

    FITB scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Fifth Third Bancorp in financial distress?

    FITB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Fifth Third Bancorp or Intel Corporation?

    FITB earns 2.4% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.