Compare StocksFISV vs ORCL

Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, FISV is undervalued at $49, with a DCF intrinsic value of $245 and a margin of safety of 80%. ORCL is undervalued at $151, with an intrinsic value of $386 and a margin of safety of 61%. Of the two, FISV has the wider margin of safety.

FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
$49.29
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$150.56

Rewards

FISV
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 15% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • 10 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
ORCL
  • Gross margin of 64.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

FISV
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (1.97x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.73 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
FISV
ORCL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-45.85B
N/A
FCF Yield
-10.07%
N/A
Trailing P/E
23.60
N/A
Forward P/E
13.70
Quality & Moat
N/A
ROIC
8.55%
N/A
ROE
41.19%
N/A
Gross Margin
63.96%
N/A
PEG Ratio
0.80
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.97
No debt
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.84
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.40%
FISV: 0ORCL: 1
FISVORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
FISV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
FISV
$-2.87
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.68B
Δ Market Cap
$-27.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$5.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$147.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
FISV
79.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 79.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $49.29
Fair Value: $245.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
60.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $150.56
Fair Value: $385.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
FISV

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
FISV
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
FISV
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
FISV
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 38.6%Institutions 43.6%Retail & Other 17.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,570
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
FISV
1
Buys (3M)
10
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.45M
FRITZ LANCE M
Director
$519,500
@ $51.95 · 2026-08-07
TODD PAUL M
Chief Financial Officer
$499,982
@ $49.70 · 2026-06-17
MAMILLI WAFAA
Director
$149,746
@ $50.59 · 2026-06-17
ROSMAN ADAM L
Officer
$500,700
@ $49.33 · 2026-06-16
NIXON, GORDON MELBOURNE
Director
$371,775
@ $49.57 · 2026-06-16
DISIMONE HARRY F
Director
$101,080
@ $48.41 · 2026-06-16
YARKONI CHARLOTTE B
Director
$100,118
@ $49.49 · 2026-06-16
ROSMAN ADAM L
Officer
$499,201
@ $63.19 · 2025-12-02
TODD PAUL M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.06M
@ $62.41 · 2025-12-01
FRITZ LANCE M
Director
$651,800
@ $65.18 · 2025-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
FISV
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
GELB ANDREW
Officer
$904,320
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-28
ROSMAN ADAM L
Officer
$403,631
@ $160.68 · 2025-05-27
GIBBONS JOHN
Officer
$3.23M
@ $238.15 · 2025-03-03
ROSMAN ADAM L
Officer
$405,971
@ $233.05 · 2025-02-27
CHIARELLO GUY
Chief Operating Officer
$10.60M
@ $235.55 · 2025-02-20
BEST KENNETH
Officer
$4.47M
@ $214.61 · 2024-11-12
MILLER HEIDI G. PH.D.
Director
$6.03M
@ $201.13 · 2024-10-30
SIMONS DOYLE R
Director
$8.08M
@ $201.97 · 2024-10-23
BISIGNANO FRANK J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.72M
@ $177.37 · 2024-09-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $111.30M
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
FISV
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 5 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
FISV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View FISV Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: FISV vs ORCL

Is Fiserv, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, FISV trades at a 79.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $245 vs. price $49), compared to ORCL's 60.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $386 vs. $151).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Fiserv, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while FISV scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Fiserv, Inc. in financial distress?

FISV's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ORCL scores 1.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.