Compare StocksFISV vs INTC

Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, FISV is undervalued at $54, with a DCF intrinsic value of $225 and a margin of safety of 76%. INTC is overvalued at $90, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. Of the two, FISV has the wider margin of safety.

FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
$53.94
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20

Rewards

FISV
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 15% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • 6 insider purchases totaling $1.7M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
INTC

    Risks

    FISV
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FISV
    INTC
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.87B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.07%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    N/A
    Forward P/E
    44.27
    Quality & Moat
    N/A
    ROIC
    3.57%
    N/A
    ROE
    -10.71%
    N/A
    Gross Margin
    38.87%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    No debt
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.24
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    FISV: 0INTC: 1
    FISVINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FISV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FISV
    $-2.87
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $9.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-27.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FISV
    76.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 76.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $53.94
    Fair Value: $225.05
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FISV

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FISV
    60/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FISV
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FISV
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FISV
    6
    Buys (3M)
    9
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.94M
    MAMILLI WAFAA
    Director
    $149,746
    @ $50.59 · 2026-06-17
    TODD PAUL M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $499,982
    @ $49.70 · 2026-06-17
    DISIMONE HARRY F
    Director
    $101,080
    @ $48.41 · 2026-06-16
    YARKONI CHARLOTTE B
    Director
    $100,118
    @ $49.49 · 2026-06-16
    ROSMAN ADAM L
    Officer
    $500,700
    @ $49.33 · 2026-06-16
    NIXON, GORDON MELBOURNE
    Director
    $371,775
    @ $49.57 · 2026-06-16
    ROSMAN ADAM L
    Officer
    $499,201
    @ $63.19 · 2025-12-02
    TODD PAUL M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $62.41 · 2025-12-01
    FRITZ LANCE M
    Director
    $651,800
    @ $65.18 · 2025-10-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FISV
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    GELB ANDREW
    Officer
    $904,320
    @ $160.00 · 2025-05-28
    ROSMAN ADAM L
    Officer
    $403,631
    @ $160.68 · 2025-05-27
    GIBBONS JOHN
    Officer
    $3.23M
    @ $238.15 · 2025-03-03
    ROSMAN ADAM L
    Officer
    $405,971
    @ $233.05 · 2025-02-27
    CHIARELLO GUY
    Chief Operating Officer
    $10.60M
    @ $235.55 · 2025-02-20
    BEST KENNETH
    Officer
    $4.47M
    @ $214.61 · 2024-11-12
    MILLER HEIDI G. PH.D.
    Director
    $6.03M
    @ $201.13 · 2024-10-30
    SIMONS DOYLE R
    Director
    $8.08M
    @ $201.97 · 2024-10-23
    BISIGNANO FRANK J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $25.72M
    @ $177.37 · 2024-09-20
    GIBBONS JOHN
    Officer
    $3.18M
    @ $168.21 · 2024-08-21
    CHIARELLO GUY
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.96M
    @ $164.97 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FISV
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 5 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FISV
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View FISV Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: FISV vs INTC

    Is Fiserv, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, FISV trades at a 76.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $225 vs. price $54), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Fiserv, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    FISV scores 60/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Fiserv, Inc. in financial distress?

    FISV's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    FISV vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io