Compare StocksFIS vs INTC

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
$49.26
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

FIS
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 42.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Insiders have bought $1.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
INTC

    Risks

    FIS
    • FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.48 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FIS
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.89B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    7.39%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    67.48
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    7.15
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    7.63%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    2.75%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    36.86%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.77
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.96
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.06
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    3.33%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    FIS: 5Ties: 2INTC: 2
    FISINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FIS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FIS
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-7.70B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-5.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FIS
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $49.26
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FIS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $49?

    +29.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.9%

    The market implies +29.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FIS
    56/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FIS
    -2.82
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FIS
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.1%Retail & Other 0.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,374
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FIS
    2
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.24M
    FERRIS STEPHANIE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $50.39 · 2026-03-05
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $60,328
    @ $64.11 · 2026-01-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $60,150
    @ $67.66 · 2025-10-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $60,023
    @ $79.29 · 2025-07-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $60,802
    @ $72.04 · 2025-04-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $56,059
    @ $79.97 · 2025-01-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $55,244
    @ $88.25 · 2024-10-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $55,226
    @ $76.81 · 2024-07-15
    GOLDSTEIN JEFFREY A.
    Director
    $56,087
    @ $72.37 · 2024-04-15
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FIS
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $125,020
    TSAI CAROLINE
    Officer
    $125,020
    @ $70.00 · 2025-09-09
    WILLIAMS LENORE DENISE
    Officer
    $994,501
    @ $87.97 · 2024-11-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FIS
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(34/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FIS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (34)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View FIS Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis