Compare StocksFICO vs INTC

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
$1113.16
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

FICO
  • Fair Isaac Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 82.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Fair Isaac Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
INTC

    Risks

    FICO
    • FCF yield of 2.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 5.34 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FICO
    INTC
    Valuation
    $573.16M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    2.17%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    41.15
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    20.86
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    23.18%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    N/A
    ROE
    -0.21%
    82.86%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    5.34
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    3.04
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    FICO: 5Ties: 1INTC: 1
    FICOINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FICO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FICO
    $15.76
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.59B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$25.12B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FICO
    34.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 34.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $1113.16
    Fair Value: $1691.04
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FICO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1113?

    +18.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +20.6%

    The market implies +18.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +20.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FICO
    100/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FICO
    -2.68
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FICO
    Insiders 2.7%Institutions 91.2%Retail & Other 6.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,413
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FICO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FICO
    1
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $88.27M
    MANOLIS EVA
    Director
    $638,368
    @ $1227.63 · 2026-02-25
    WEBER STEVEN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.58M
    @ $1810.00 · 2025-12-17
    MANOLIS EVA
    Director
    $951,257
    @ $1825.83 · 2025-12-12
    MCMORRIS MARC F
    Director
    $434,287
    @ $1809.53 · 2025-11-26
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.06M
    @ $1631.34 · 2025-10-14
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $1650.17 · 2025-10-14
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.24M
    @ $1537.50 · 2025-09-09
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.03M
    @ $1501.84 · 2025-08-28
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.97M
    @ $1565.99 · 2025-07-08
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.92M
    @ $1780.48 · 2025-07-08
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.62M
    @ $1767.82 · 2025-06-10
    WEBER STEVEN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.74M
    @ $1738.25 · 2025-06-09
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.64M
    @ $2147.97 · 2025-05-13
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $2170.34 · 2025-05-13
    MCMORRIS MARC F
    Director
    $1.66M
    @ $2087.50 · 2025-05-09
    BOWERS THOMAS A
    Officer
    $8.39M
    @ $2057.05 · 2025-05-02
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.14M
    @ $1683.35 · 2025-04-08
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.21M
    @ $1761.13 · 2025-04-08
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.25M
    @ $1694.38 · 2025-03-11
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.07M
    @ $1727.69 · 2025-03-11
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.84M
    @ $1804.23 · 2025-02-11
    WEBER STEVEN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $273,054
    @ $1964.42 · 2025-01-08
    MCMORRIS MARC F
    Director
    $1.12M
    @ $2152.57 · 2024-12-17
    WEHMANN JAMES M.
    Officer
    $6.59M
    @ $2195.19 · 2024-12-12
    SCADINA MARK R
    General Counsel
    $2,390
    @ $2390.00 · 2024-12-09
    SCADINA MARK R
    General Counsel
    $6.16M
    @ $2389.99 · 2024-12-06
    WEHMANN JAMES M.
    Officer
    $8.31M
    @ $2373.85 · 2024-12-05
    WEHMANN JAMES M.
    Officer
    $8.12M
    @ $2320.41 · 2024-11-21
    REY DAVID A
    Director
    $10.95M
    @ $2340.28 · 2024-11-11
    STANSBURY HENRY TAYLOE
    Director
    $582,299
    @ $2338.55 · 2024-11-11
    BOWERS THOMAS A
    Officer
    $6.27M
    @ $2338.21 · 2024-11-11
    KELLY BRADEN R
    Director
    $9.10M
    @ $2343.43 · 2024-11-11
    REES JOANNA
    Director
    $6.93M
    @ $1750.00 · 2024-09-05
    MCMORRIS MARC F
    Director
    $2.59M
    @ $1749.33 · 2024-08-13
    BOWERS THOMAS A
    Officer
    $5.15M
    @ $1715.27 · 2024-08-12
    WEBER STEVEN P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.12M
    @ $1735.00 · 2024-08-09
    SCADINA MARK R
    General Counsel
    $6.00M
    @ $1714.18 · 2024-08-08
    SCADINA MARK R
    General Counsel
    $6.93M
    @ $1385.77 · 2024-06-14
    SCADINA MARK R
    General Counsel
    $10.61M
    @ $1372.58 · 2024-05-24
    MCMORRIS MARC F
    Director
    $2.26M
    @ $1413.20 · 2024-05-17
    LANSING WILLIAM J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.12M
    @ $1140.55 · 2024-04-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FICO
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(24/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FICO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (24)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View FICO Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis