Compare StocksFDX vs INTC

FedEx Corporation (FDX) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

FDX
FedEx Corporation
$393.67
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

FDX
  • Dividend yield of 1.47% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
INTC

    Risks

    FDX
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.34 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Trailing P/E of 21.0x is 36% above the historical average of 15.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • 5 insider sales totaling $18.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FDX
    INTC
    Valuation
    $2.98B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    3.17%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    21.01
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    17.61
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    7.02%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    13.73%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    27.55%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.21
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.41
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.92
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    1.47%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    FDX: 6Ties: 1INTC: 3
    FDXINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FDX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FDX
    $2.75
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $8.62B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$23.74B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FDX
    4.9% Overvalued
    Price is 4.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $393.67
    Fair Value: $375.36
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FDX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $394?

    +13.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.1%

    The market implies +13.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FDX
    56/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FDX
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FDX
    Insiders 7.4%Institutions 80.1%Retail & Other 12.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,422
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FDX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    DIETRICH JOHN W
    Chief Financial Officer
    $273,980
    @ $273.98 · 2025-01-07
    LANE AMY BETH
    Director
    $91,929
    @ $276.06 · 2024-12-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FDX
    5
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $21.67M
    SCHWAB SUSAN C
    Director
    $2.14M
    @ $369.00 · 2026-04-15
    BRIGHTMAN TRACY B
    Officer
    $6.16M
    @ $363.47 · 2026-04-15
    CARERE BRIE
    Officer
    $999,068
    @ $370.03 · 2026-04-14
    ADAMS GINA F
    General Counsel
    $7.49M
    @ $366.45 · 2026-04-14
    PREET KAWAL
    Officer
    $1.80M
    @ $367.89 · 2026-04-14
    RAMO JOSHUA COOPER
    Director
    $838,361
    @ $232.23 · 2025-07-23
    ELLISON MARVIN R
    Director
    $855,353
    @ $236.94 · 2025-07-09
    WALSH PAUL S
    Director
    $860,241
    @ $238.29 · 2025-07-08
    MARTIN ROBERT BRAD
    Director
    $513,235
    @ $241.75 · 2025-07-07
    SMITH JOHN ALAN
    Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $243.55 · 2025-03-27
    ADAMS GINA F
    General Counsel
    $1.15M
    @ $241.85 · 2025-03-24
    SCHWAB SUSAN C
    Director
    $1.10M
    @ $276.45 · 2025-01-14
    SMITH RICHARD W.
    Officer
    $713,373
    @ $276.93 · 2025-01-07
    CARERE BRIE
    Officer
    $607,822
    @ $310.43 · 2024-07-18
    KRISHNASAMY SRIRAM
    Officer
    $2.61M
    @ $310.14 · 2024-07-17
    ELLISON MARVIN R
    Director
    $758,831
    @ $299.34 · 2024-07-11
    ERWIN GUY M II
    Officer
    $34,712
    @ $299.24 · 2024-07-03
    STEINER DAVID P
    Director
    $407,561
    @ $297.71 · 2024-07-02
    WALSH PAUL S
    Director
    $747,126
    @ $294.72 · 2024-06-28
    ALLEN MARK RUSSELL
    General Counsel
    $23.04M
    @ $295.70 · 2024-06-28
    CARTER ROBERT B
    Chief Technology Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $294.48 · 2024-06-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FDX
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(68/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FDX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View FDX Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    FDX vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io