Compare Stocks › FDX vs INTC

FedEx Corporation (FDX) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, FDX is undervalued at $313, with a DCF intrinsic value of $620 and a margin of safety of 49%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, FDX has the wider margin of safety.

FDX
FedEx Corporation
$313.28
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

FDX
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 24.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.28 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

FDX
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.7% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
FDX
INTC
Valuation
$5.66B
Free Cash Flow
$670.37M
7.71%
FCF Yield
0.19%
16.89
Trailing P/E
N/A
14.99
Forward P/E
35.50
Quality & Moat
5.44%
ROIC
4.06%
14.85%
ROE
-9.62%
27.32%
Gross Margin
40.15%
1.87
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
0.66
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.91
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
1.56%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
FDX: 6Ties: 1INTC: 4
FDXINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
FDX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
FDX
$2.70
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$8.88B
Δ Market Cap
+$23.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
FDX
49.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 49.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $313.28
Fair Value: $619.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
FDX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $313?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.5%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +5.5%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
FDX
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
FDX
-2.62
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
FDX
Insiders 6.3%Institutions 83.8%Retail & Other 9.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,478
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
FDX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DIETRICH JOHN W
Chief Financial Officer
$273,980
@ $273.98 · 2025-01-07
LANE AMY BETH
Director
$91,929
@ $276.06 · 2024-12-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
FDX
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.23M
WALSH PAUL S
Director
$1.64M
@ $324.56 · 2026-06-30
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$2.14M
@ $369.00 · 2026-04-15
BRIGHTMAN TRACY B
Officer
$6.16M
@ $363.47 · 2026-04-15
CARERE BRIE
Officer
$999,068
@ $370.03 · 2026-04-14
ADAMS GINA F
General Counsel
$7.49M
@ $366.45 · 2026-04-14
PREET KAWAL
Officer
$1.80M
@ $367.89 · 2026-04-14
RAMO JOSHUA COOPER
Director
$838,361
@ $232.23 · 2025-07-23
ELLISON MARVIN R
Director
$855,353
@ $236.94 · 2025-07-09
WALSH PAUL S
Director
$860,241
@ $238.29 · 2025-07-08
MARTIN ROBERT BRAD
Director
$513,235
@ $241.75 · 2025-07-07
SMITH JOHN ALAN
Officer
$1.50M
@ $243.55 · 2025-03-27
ADAMS GINA F
General Counsel
$1.15M
@ $241.85 · 2025-03-24
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$1.10M
@ $276.45 · 2025-01-14
SMITH RICHARD W.
Officer
$713,373
@ $276.93 · 2025-01-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
FDX
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
FDX
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View FDX Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: FDX vs INTC

Is FedEx Corporation or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, FDX trades at a 49.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $620 vs. price $313), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, FedEx Corporation or Intel Corporation?▼

FDX scores 57/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FDX scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, FedEx Corporation or Intel Corporation?▼

FedEx Corporation (FDX) generates a 7.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, FedEx Corporation or Intel Corporation?▼

FDX earns 5.4% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

FDX vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io