Compare StocksFDS vs INTU

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, FDS is undervalued at $221, with a DCF intrinsic value of $408 and a margin of safety of 46%. INTU is undervalued at $267, with an intrinsic value of $534 and a margin of safety of 50%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
$221.29
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00

Rewards

FDS
  • FactSet Research Systems Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • FactSet Research Systems Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

FDS
  • FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
FDS
INTU
Valuation
$590.25M
Free Cash Flow
$5.23B
7.32%
FCF Yield
7.16%
14.25
Trailing P/E
16.29
11.41
Forward P/E
9.77
Quality & Moat
15.35%
ROIC
28.21%
28.08%
ROE
22.50%
51.94%
Gross Margin
80.79%
1.05
PEG Ratio
0.69
Balance Sheet Safety
0.60
Net Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.39
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.02
2.10%
Dividend Yield
1.80%
FDS: 3Ties: 2INTU: 7
FDSINTU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
FDS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
FDS
$-3.76
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.15B
Δ Market Cap
$-4.34B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
FDS
45.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 45.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $221.29
Fair Value: $408.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
50.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $533.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
FDS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $221?

+2.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +2.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
FDS
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
FDS
-2.40
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
FDS
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 106.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,002
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.6%Retail & Other 5.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,817
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
FDS
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $328,394
SKOKO GORAN
Officer
$126,465
@ $252.93 · 2025-11-06
SHAN HELEN L
Chief Financial Officer
$101,928
@ $275.48 · 2025-10-06
MCLOUGHLIN CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$100,001
@ $296.74 · 2025-09-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
FDS
0
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.68M
FRANK MALCOLM
Director
$760,547
@ $295.70 · 2026-01-12
SIEGEL LAURIE A
Director
$761,944
@ $296.25 · 2026-01-08
EILAM BARAK
Director
$283.00
@ $283.00 · 2025-10-03
MCGONIGLE JAMES J. III
Director
$1.32M
@ $451.39 · 2025-07-14
MOSKOFF GREGORY T
Officer
$1.11M
@ $442.60 · 2025-07-09
ELLIS CHRISTOPHER R
Officer
$3.40M
@ $446.84 · 2025-07-08
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.34M
@ $445.12 · 2025-07-01
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.36M
@ $454.58 · 2025-06-02
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.29M
@ $431.09 · 2025-05-01
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.36M
@ $454.86 · 2025-04-01
MOSKOFF GREGORY T
Officer
$157,604
@ $434.17 · 2025-03-24
STEPP KATHERINE M
Chief Technology Officer
$733,561
@ $425.25 · 2025-03-21
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.39M
@ $464.79 · 2025-03-03
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.41M
@ $469.14 · 2025-02-03
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.45M
@ $484.33 · 2025-01-02
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.47M
@ $489.18 · 2024-12-02
ROBIE ROBERT J
Officer
$1.94M
@ $484.96 · 2024-11-12
COSTIGAN JOHN
Officer
$780,174
@ $481.00 · 2024-11-11
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.36M
@ $453.68 · 2024-11-01
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.37M
@ $455.09 · 2024-10-01
FRANK MALCOLM
Director
$1.30M
@ $457.85 · 2024-09-26
SIEGEL LAURIE A
Director
$615,277
@ $459.85 · 2024-09-26
MCGONIGLE JAMES J. III
Director
$2.47M
@ $456.83 · 2024-09-26
ELLIS CHRISTOPHER R
Officer
$6.36M
@ $456.15 · 2024-09-26
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $416.59 · 2024-09-03
HARDING CATRINA
Officer
$184,806
@ $407.96 · 2024-08-05
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.24M
@ $412.75 · 2024-08-01
SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
Chief Executive Officer
$1.23M
@ $408.98 · 2024-07-01
ABRAMS ROBIN ANN
Director
$999,186
@ $420.71 · 2024-06-25
STEPP KATHERINE M
Chief Technology Officer
$452,840
@ $428.42 · 2024-06-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.55M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$80,145
@ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
FDS
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
FDS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View FDS Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: FDS vs INTU

Is FactSet Research Systems Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 50.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $534 vs. price $267), compared to FDS's 45.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $408 vs. $221).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, FactSet Research Systems Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

FDS scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, FactSet Research Systems Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) generates a 7.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Intuit Inc.'s 7.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, FactSet Research Systems Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus FDS's 15.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, FactSet Research Systems Inc.'s or Intuit Inc.'s?

INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to FDS's 94/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

FDS vs INTU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io