Compare StocksFDS vs INTC

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
$208.84
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

FDS
  • FactSet Research Systems Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • FactSet Research Systems Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
INTC

    Risks

    FDS
    • FCF yield of 7.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • PEG ratio of 3.02 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FDS
    INTC
    Valuation
    $545.51M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    6.98%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    13.28
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    11.01
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    16.32%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    27.54%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    52.26%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    3.02
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.72
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.38
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    2.11%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    FDS: 6Ties: 1INTC: 2
    FDSINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FDS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FDS
    $-3.76
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.15B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-4.34B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FDS
    36.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 36.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $208.84
    Fair Value: $326.13
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FDS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $209?

    +4.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +5.2%

    The market implies +4.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FDS
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FDS
    -2.40
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FDS
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 102.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,081
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FDS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $328,394
    SKOKO GORAN
    Officer
    $126,465
    @ $252.93 · 2025-11-06
    SHAN HELEN L
    Chief Financial Officer
    $101,928
    @ $275.48 · 2025-10-06
    MCLOUGHLIN CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $100,001
    @ $296.74 · 2025-09-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FDS
    2
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $13.60M
    FRANK MALCOLM
    Director
    $760,547
    @ $295.70 · 2026-01-12
    SIEGEL LAURIE A
    Director
    $761,944
    @ $296.25 · 2026-01-08
    EILAM BARAK
    Director
    $283.00
    @ $283.00 · 2025-10-03
    MCGONIGLE JAMES J. III
    Director
    $1.32M
    @ $451.39 · 2025-07-14
    MOSKOFF GREGORY T
    Officer
    $1.11M
    @ $442.60 · 2025-07-09
    ELLIS CHRISTOPHER R
    Officer
    $3.40M
    @ $446.84 · 2025-07-08
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.34M
    @ $445.12 · 2025-07-01
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $454.58 · 2025-06-02
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.29M
    @ $431.09 · 2025-05-01
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $454.86 · 2025-04-01
    MOSKOFF GREGORY T
    Officer
    $157,604
    @ $434.17 · 2025-03-24
    STEPP KATHERINE M
    Chief Technology Officer
    $733,561
    @ $425.25 · 2025-03-21
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $464.79 · 2025-03-03
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $469.14 · 2025-02-03
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.45M
    @ $484.33 · 2025-01-02
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $489.18 · 2024-12-02
    ROBIE ROBERT J
    Officer
    $1.94M
    @ $484.96 · 2024-11-12
    COSTIGAN JOHN
    Officer
    $780,174
    @ $481.00 · 2024-11-11
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $453.68 · 2024-11-01
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $455.09 · 2024-10-01
    SIEGEL LAURIE A
    Director
    $615,277
    @ $459.85 · 2024-09-26
    ELLIS CHRISTOPHER R
    Officer
    $6.36M
    @ $456.15 · 2024-09-26
    FRANK MALCOLM
    Director
    $1.30M
    @ $457.85 · 2024-09-26
    MCGONIGLE JAMES J. III
    Director
    $2.47M
    @ $456.83 · 2024-09-26
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $416.59 · 2024-09-03
    HARDING CATRINA
    Officer
    $184,806
    @ $407.96 · 2024-08-05
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $412.75 · 2024-08-01
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $408.98 · 2024-07-01
    ABRAMS ROBIN ANN
    Director
    $999,186
    @ $420.71 · 2024-06-25
    STEPP KATHERINE M
    Chief Technology Officer
    $452,840
    @ $428.42 · 2024-06-24
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $400.00 · 2024-06-03
    SKOKO GORAN
    Officer
    $668,715
    @ $445.81 · 2024-05-15
    SKOKO GORAN
    Officer
    $2.71M
    @ $436.40 · 2024-05-10
    ROBIE ROBERT J
    Officer
    $1.87M
    @ $431.48 · 2024-05-06
    SKOKO GORAN
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $428.57 · 2024-05-03
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $415.26 · 2024-05-01
    MOSKOFF GREGORY T
    Officer
    $138,435
    @ $419.50 · 2024-04-30
    SNOW FREDERICK PHILIP
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $452.10 · 2024-04-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FDS
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(25/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FDS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View FDS Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis