Compare StocksFCX vs TXN

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. (FCX) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, FCX is undervalued at $63, with a DCF intrinsic value of $99525043188 and a margin of safety of 100%. TXN is fairly valued at $276, with an intrinsic value of $318 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, FCX has the wider margin of safety.

FCX
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
$62.63
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$275.74

Rewards

FCX
  • Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
TXN
  • Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Altman Z-Score of 8.73 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

FCX
  • PEG ratio of 5.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.01 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 12.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
TXN
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 41.8x is 55% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
FCX
TXN
Valuation
$2.16B
Free Cash Flow
$3.55B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.41%
30.70
Trailing P/E
41.84
15.32
Forward P/E
26.50
Quality & Moat
16.03%
ROIC
20.41%
14.75%
ROE
35.18%
38.27%
Gross Margin
58.33%
5.61
PEG Ratio
1.22
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Net Debt / Equity
0.39
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.66
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.74
0.96%
Dividend Yield
2.06%
FCX: 4Ties: 1TXN: 6
FCXTXN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
FCX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
FCX
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.35B
Δ Market Cap
+$12.79
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
FCX
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $62.63
Fair Value: $99525043187.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TXN
0.3% Overvalued
Price is 0.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $275.74
Fair Value: $275.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
FCX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $63?

-21.3%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $276?

+20.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.5%

The market implies +20.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
FCX
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
FCX
-2.05
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
FCX
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 88.4%Retail & Other 10.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,447
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 92.2%Retail & Other 7.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,410
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
FCX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
FCX
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $35.79M
MIKES ELLIE L.
Officer
$682,345
@ $62.03 · 2026-02-18
ROBERTSON MAREE E
Chief Financial Officer
$2.99M
@ $61.55 · 2026-02-13
CURRAULT DOUGLAS NICHOLAS II
General Counsel
$4.84M
@ $64.52 · 2026-02-11
ADKERSON RICHARD C
Chairman of the Board
$25.46M
@ $63.50 · 2026-02-11
MIKES ELLIE L.
Officer
$456,202
@ $47.66 · 2025-12-11
HIGGINS STEPHEN T
Officer
$1.36M
@ $47.99 · 2025-12-11
MIKES ELLIE L.
Officer
$343,520
@ $40.02 · 2025-06-02
ROBERTSON MAREE E
Chief Financial Officer
$583,878
@ $44.91 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TXN
5
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $113.32M
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$2.09M
@ $208.80 · 2024-10-25
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$2.76M
@ $213.72 · 2024-08-29
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.22M
@ $212.63 · 2024-08-29
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$1.00M
@ $213.08 · 2024-08-29
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.29M
@ $212.43 · 2024-08-29
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$892,427
@ $209.98 · 2024-08-27
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$251,324
@ $209.44 · 2024-08-26
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$789,215
@ $208.90 · 2024-08-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
FCX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TXN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
FCX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
TXN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View FCX Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: FCX vs TXN

Is Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, FCX trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $99525043188 vs. price $63), compared to TXN's 13.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $318 vs. $276).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

FCX scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. in financial distress?

FCX's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TXN scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

TXN earns 20.4% ROIC versus FCX's 16.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?

FCX's dividend earns a safety score of 70/100 (Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). FCX has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.