Compare Stocks › FANG vs INTU

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, FANG is overvalued at $212, with a DCF intrinsic value of $134 and a margin of safety of -59%. INTU is undervalued at $341, with an intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$212.08
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09

Rewards

FANG
  • ★Gross margin of 72.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.5% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

FANG
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 16.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Diamondback Energy, Inc. scores only 14/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 58% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
INTU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FANG
    INTU
    Valuation
    $5.04B
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.62B
    8.48%
    FCF Yield
    9.45%
    40.40
    Trailing P/E
    20.72
    10.09
    Forward P/E
    12.66
    Quality & Moat
    10.99%
    ROIC
    10.90%
    3.49%
    ROE
    23.60%
    72.35%
    Gross Margin
    80.98%
    10.36
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.28
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.06
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.03
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.18
    2.07%
    Dividend Yield
    1.62%
    FANG: 2Ties: 2INTU: 8
    FANGINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FANG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FANG
    $4.58
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$18.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $-10.70
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-83.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FANG
    345.8% Overvalued
    Price is 345.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $212.08
    Fair Value: $47.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    39.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $341.09
    Fair Value: $567.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FANG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $212?

    +18.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +3.0%

    The market implies +18.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

    +6.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -0.9%

    The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FANG
    14/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FANG
    -2.99
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FANG
    Insiders 23.9%Institutions 73.5%Retail & Other 2.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,616
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,538
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FANG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    TSURU FRANK D
    Director
    $313,020
    @ $156.51 · 2025-02-28
    WEST STEVEN E
    Director
    $975,960
    @ $162.66 · 2024-12-16
    REEVES ROBERT K
    Director
    $509,760
    @ $180.00 · 2024-11-08
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FANG
    10
    Sells (3M)
    42
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.93B
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $1.86B
    @ $205.26 · 2026-09-16
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $281,848
    @ $212.56 · 2026-09-15
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $210.00 · 2026-09-15
    STICE TRAVIS D
    Director
    $15.32M
    @ $204.31 · 2026-09-11
    PLAUMANN MARK LAWRENCE
    Director
    $210,577
    @ $210.58 · 2026-08-21
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.61M
    @ $215.21 · 2026-08-20
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.15M
    @ $214.66 · 2026-08-20
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $506,930
    @ $202.77 · 2026-08-14
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Officer
    $102,070
    @ $204.14 · 2026-08-14
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $202.46 · 2026-08-11
    PLAUMANN MARK LAWRENCE
    Director
    $98,250
    @ $196.50 · 2026-06-09
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $2.04B
    @ $204.25 · 2026-06-04
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $205.00 · 2026-06-04
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $210.00 · 2026-06-03
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.13M
    @ $208.33 · 2026-06-03
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $200.90 · 2026-06-02
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $200.54 · 2026-06-01
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $207.00 · 2026-05-19
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $203,160
    @ $203.16 · 2026-05-15
    BARKMANN ALBERT
    Officer
    $612,112
    @ $204.04 · 2026-05-15
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $200.00 · 2026-05-14
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $200.10 · 2026-05-13
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $959,776
    @ $191.96 · 2026-03-20
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $965,000
    @ $193.00 · 2026-03-20
    WEST STEVEN E
    Director
    $1.13M
    @ $188.35 · 2026-03-18
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $781,293
    @ $190.51 · 2026-03-18
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $950,000
    @ $190.00 · 2026-03-18
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $136,851
    @ $182.47 · 2026-03-16
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $3.76M
    @ $180.00 · 2026-03-13
    BARKMANN ALBERT
    Officer
    $731,600
    @ $182.90 · 2026-03-13
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $2.15B
    @ $170.19 · 2026-03-12
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $183.07 · 2026-03-09
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.62M
    @ $181.11 · 2026-03-06
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $136,260
    @ $181.68 · 2026-03-06
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $180.84 · 2026-03-06
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $176.71M
    @ $176.71 · 2026-03-04
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $331.87M
    @ $165.94 · 2026-02-04
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $305.18M
    @ $152.59 · 2025-11-28
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $596,948
    @ $149.24 · 2025-11-26
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $518,630
    @ $148.18 · 2025-11-14
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $147,730
    @ $147.73 · 2025-11-11
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $140.61 · 2025-11-06
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $212,275
    @ $141.52 · 2025-06-09
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Officer
    $710,306
    @ $142.06 · 2025-06-03
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $1.43M
    @ $142.69 · 2025-05-12
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $653,928
    @ $163.48 · 2024-12-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    2
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.54M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FANG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(71/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FANG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
    INTU
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    View FANG Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: FANG vs INTU

    Is Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $568 vs. price $341), compared to FANG's -58.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $134 vs. $212).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?▼

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while FANG scores 14/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Diamondback Energy, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    FANG's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?▼

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 9.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s 8.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Diamondback Energy, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?▼

    FANG earns 11.0% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s or Intuit Inc.'s?▼

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to FANG's 60/100 (Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    FANG vs INTU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io