Compare StocksFANG vs INTC

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$190.31
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

FANG
  • Gross margin of 73.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.58 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    FANG
    • ROIC has declined by 16.6 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Diamondback Energy, Inc. scores only 14/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    FANG
    INTC
    Valuation
    $602.63M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    1.12%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    33.21
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    14.69
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    -15.96%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    3.87%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    73.04%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.34
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.39
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    2.21%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    FANG: 6Ties: 1INTC: 2
    FANGINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    FANG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    FANG
    $4.58
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.97B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$18.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    FANG
    0.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 0.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $190.31
    Fair Value: $192.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    FANG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $190?

    +17.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +31.7%

    The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +31.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    FANG
    14/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    FANG
    -2.99
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    FANG
    Insiders 30.8%Institutions 65.1%Retail & Other 4.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,480
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    FANG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    TSURU FRANK D
    Director
    $313,020
    @ $156.51 · 2025-02-28
    WEST STEVEN E
    Director
    $975,960
    @ $162.66 · 2024-12-16
    REEVES ROBERT K
    Director
    $509,760
    @ $180.00 · 2024-11-08
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    FANG
    10
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.98B
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $136,851
    @ $182.47 · 2026-03-16
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $3.76M
    @ $180.00 · 2026-03-13
    BARKMANN ALBERT
    Officer
    $731,600
    @ $182.90 · 2026-03-13
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $2.15B
    @ $170.19 · 2026-03-12
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $183.07 · 2026-03-09
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.62M
    @ $181.11 · 2026-03-06
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $136,260
    @ $181.68 · 2026-03-06
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $180.84 · 2026-03-06
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $176.71M
    @ $176.71 · 2026-03-04
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $331.87M
    @ $165.94 · 2026-02-04
    SGF FANG HOLDINGS,LP
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $305.18M
    @ $152.59 · 2025-11-28
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $596,948
    @ $149.24 · 2025-11-26
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $518,630
    @ $148.18 · 2025-11-14
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $147,730
    @ $147.73 · 2025-11-11
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $140.61 · 2025-11-06
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Chief Financial Officer
    $212,275
    @ $141.52 · 2025-06-09
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Officer
    $710,306
    @ $142.06 · 2025-06-03
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $1.43M
    @ $142.69 · 2025-05-12
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $653,928
    @ $163.48 · 2024-12-13
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $200.00 · 2024-08-09
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $9.91M
    @ $198.15 · 2024-08-08
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $778,760
    @ $194.69 · 2024-06-10
    BARKMANN ALBERT
    Officer
    $194,750
    @ $194.75 · 2024-06-10
    WESSON DANIEL N.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $197.14 · 2024-05-28
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $1.19M
    @ $198.15 · 2024-05-17
    VANT HOF MATTHEW KAES
    President
    $4.89M
    @ $195.69 · 2024-05-16
    THOMPSON JERE W III
    Officer
    $179,910
    @ $199.90 · 2024-05-03
    ZMIGROSKY MATTHEW PAUL
    Officer
    $969,684
    @ $193.94 · 2024-03-21
    DICK TERESA L
    Officer
    $387,840
    @ $193.92 · 2024-03-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    FANG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(70/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    FANG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View FANG Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io