Compare StocksF vs QCOM

Ford Motor Company (F) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, F is overvalued at $14, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. QCOM is overvalued at $226, with an intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, QCOM has the wider margin of safety.

F
Ford Motor Company
$14.06
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11

Rewards

F
    QCOM
    • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    F
    • ROIC has declined by 6.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 7.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • PEG ratio of 8.48 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    QCOM
    • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    F
    QCOM
    Valuation
    $-2.25B
    Free Cash Flow
    $12.82B
    -4.01%
    FCF Yield
    5.38%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    24.34
    7.66
    Forward P/E
    21.20
    Quality & Moat
    4.37%
    ROIC
    18.22%
    -14.81%
    ROE
    36.08%
    7.06%
    Gross Margin
    54.80%
    8.48
    PEG Ratio
    0.91
    Balance Sheet Safety
    3.67
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    18.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.42
    4.16%
    Dividend Yield
    1.72%
    F: 2Ties: 1QCOM: 8
    FQCOM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    F

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    QCOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    F
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-9.06B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$5.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    QCOM
    $5.06
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $11.96B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$60.46B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    F
    19.0% Overvalued
    Price is 19.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $14.06
    Fair Value: $11.82
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    QCOM
    178.3% Overvalued
    Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $226.11
    Fair Value: $81.25
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    F

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    QCOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

    +17.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.0%

    The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    F
    35/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    QCOM
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    F
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    QCOM
    -3.16
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    F
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.5%Retail & Other 32.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,169
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    QCOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,615
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    F
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.03M
    FORD WILLIAM CLAY JR
    Officer and Director
    $1.93M
    @ $13.82 · 2026-02-19
    THORNTON JOHN L
    Director
    $99,189
    @ $13.19 · 2025-11-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    QCOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    F
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $675,000
    FRICK ANDREW
    Officer
    $675,000
    @ $11.25 · 2025-07-02
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    QCOM
    3
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.65M
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,380
    @ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $529,741
    @ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $325,854
    @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $330,815
    @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $458,799
    @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $577,620
    @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.28M
    @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $567,702
    @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $522,808
    @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $122,463
    @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,610
    @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $537,560
    @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $486,965
    @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $120,808
    @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $465,846
    @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $91,442
    @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $119,900
    @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $235,262
    @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $523,292
    @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $130,074
    @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $509,397
    @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $463,851
    @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $409,056
    @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.24M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $484,617
    @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $202,120
    @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $491,349
    @ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $313,779
    @ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $539,157
    @ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    F
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    QCOM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    F
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    QCOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    View F Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: F vs QCOM

    Is Ford Motor Company or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, QCOM trades at a -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $128 vs. price $226), compared to F's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $14).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ford Motor Company or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

    QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while F scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Ford Motor Company in financial distress?

    F's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Ford Motor Company or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

    QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Ford Motor Company's -4.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ford Motor Company or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

    QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus F's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Ford Motor Company's or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

    QCOM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to F's 65/100 (Safe). QCOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    F vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io