Compare StocksEXPD vs INTC

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
$147.24
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EXPD
  • Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.22 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    EXPD
    • Gross margin of 13.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 22.4% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    INTC
    Valuation
    $803.04M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    4.07%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    24.75
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    22.76
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    26.23%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    34.36%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    13.44%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.24
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.67
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.05%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EXPD: 7Ties: 1INTC: 1
    EXPDINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EXPD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    $2.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.76B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.91B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    10.5% Overvalued
    Price is 10.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $147.24
    Fair Value: $133.30
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EXPD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $147?

    +9.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.0%

    The market implies +9.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 101.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,241
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.56M
    BELL BLAKE R
    Officer
    $1.49M
    @ $144.08 · 2026-02-27
    WALL DANIEL R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $884,927
    @ $145.07 · 2026-02-27
    EMMERT MARK A
    Director
    $730,350
    @ $135.25 · 2025-11-07
    DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
    General Counsel
    $201,255
    @ $134.17 · 2025-11-05
    CARLILE ROBERT PAUL
    Director
    $301,268
    @ $120.51 · 2025-09-05
    EMMERT MARK A
    Director
    $497,150
    @ $121.26 · 2025-08-19
    DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
    General Counsel
    $173,535
    @ $118.05 · 2025-08-07
    BELL BLAKE R
    Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $117.89 · 2025-08-06
    WALL DANIEL R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.16M
    @ $115.91 · 2025-05-12
    DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
    General Counsel
    $146,923
    @ $117.54 · 2025-02-20
    CARLILE ROBERT PAUL
    Director
    $363,332
    @ $121.11 · 2024-12-10
    DUBOIS JAMES M
    Director
    $433,505
    @ $123.05 · 2024-06-14
    EMMERT MARK A
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $123.66 · 2024-06-14
    BELL BLAKE R
    Officer
    $479,659
    @ $116.99 · 2024-05-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EXPD Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis