Compare StocksEXPD vs INTC

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, EXPD is overvalued at $161, with a DCF intrinsic value of $101 and a margin of safety of -60%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, EXPD has the wider margin of safety.

EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
$161.32
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Rewards

EXPD
  • Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
INTC

    Risks

    EXPD
    • Gross margin of 13.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 26.1x is 28% above the historical average of 20.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • PEG ratio of 3.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    INTC
    Valuation
    $783.25M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    3.71%
    FCF Yield
    -1.23%
    26.10
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    23.65
    Forward P/E
    86.70
    Quality & Moat
    32.83%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    36.64%
    ROE
    -2.91%
    13.62%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    3.77
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.10
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.66
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    0.99%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    EXPD: 8Ties: 1INTC: 2
    EXPDINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EXPD

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    $2.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.76B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.91B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    59.7% Overvalued
    Price is 59.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $161.32
    Fair Value: $101.02
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EXPD

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $161?

    +10.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +11.3%

    The market implies +10.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 101.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,297
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    0
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.40M
    WALL DANIEL R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $884,927
    @ $145.07 · 2026-02-27
    BELL BLAKE R
    Officer
    $1.49M
    @ $144.08 · 2026-02-27
    EMMERT MARK A
    Director
    $730,350
    @ $135.25 · 2025-11-07
    DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
    General Counsel
    $201,255
    @ $134.17 · 2025-11-05
    CARLILE ROBERT PAUL
    Director
    $301,268
    @ $120.51 · 2025-09-05
    EMMERT MARK A
    Director
    $497,150
    @ $121.26 · 2025-08-19
    DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
    General Counsel
    $173,535
    @ $118.05 · 2025-08-07
    BELL BLAKE R
    Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $117.89 · 2025-08-06
    WALL DANIEL R.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.16M
    @ $115.91 · 2025-05-12
    DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
    General Counsel
    $146,923
    @ $117.54 · 2025-02-20
    CARLILE ROBERT PAUL
    Director
    $363,332
    @ $121.11 · 2024-12-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EXPD
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View EXPD Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: EXPD vs INTC

    Is Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, EXPD trades at a -59.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $101 vs. price $161), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    EXPD scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EXPD scores 8.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) generates a 3.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    EXPD earns 32.8% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.