Compare StocksEXPD vs GOOGL

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
$147.23
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69

Rewards

EXPD
  • Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Altman Z-Score of 8.83 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

EXPD
  • Gross margin of 13.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • PEG ratio of 3.79 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EXPD
GOOGL
Valuation
$803.04M
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
4.10%
FCF Yield
1.57%
24.74
Trailing P/E
29.42
22.77
Forward P/E
27.06
Quality & Moat
26.23%
ROIC
20.98%
34.36%
ROE
27.61%
13.44%
Gross Margin
60.37%
3.79
PEG Ratio
0.36
Balance Sheet Safety
0.24
Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.67
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
1.05%
Dividend Yield
0.22%
EXPD: 7Ties: 1GOOGL: 4
EXPDGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EXPD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EXPD
$2.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.76B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.91B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EXPD
12.1% Overvalued
Price is 12.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.23
Fair Value: $131.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EXPD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $147?

+9.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.9%

The market implies +9.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EXPD
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EXPD
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EXPD
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 101.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,246
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EXPD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EXPD
2
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.56M
BELL BLAKE R
Officer
$1.49M
@ $144.08 · 2026-02-27
WALL DANIEL R.
Chief Executive Officer
$884,927
@ $145.07 · 2026-02-27
EMMERT MARK A
Director
$730,350
@ $135.25 · 2025-11-07
DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
General Counsel
$201,255
@ $134.17 · 2025-11-05
CARLILE ROBERT PAUL
Director
$301,268
@ $120.51 · 2025-09-05
EMMERT MARK A
Director
$497,150
@ $121.26 · 2025-08-19
DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
General Counsel
$173,535
@ $118.05 · 2025-08-07
BELL BLAKE R
Officer
$2.12M
@ $117.89 · 2025-08-06
WALL DANIEL R.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.16M
@ $115.91 · 2025-05-12
DICKERMAN JEFFREY F
General Counsel
$146,923
@ $117.54 · 2025-02-20
CARLILE ROBERT PAUL
Director
$363,332
@ $121.11 · 2024-12-10
EMMERT MARK A
Director
$1.00M
@ $123.66 · 2024-06-14
DUBOIS JAMES M
Director
$433,505
@ $123.05 · 2024-06-14
BELL BLAKE R
Officer
$479,659
@ $116.99 · 2024-05-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EXPD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EXPD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View EXPD Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis
EXPD vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io