Compare StocksEXE vs GS

Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)

EXE
Expand Energy Corporation
$100.77
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$903.27

Rewards

EXE
    GS
    • Gross margin of 82.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    EXE
    • ROIC has declined by 14.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Expand Energy Corporation scores only 21/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 78% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    GS
    • High leverage (6.79x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $13.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EXE
    GS
    Valuation
    $1.70B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    7.03%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    7.50
    Trailing P/E
    16.49
    10.32
    Forward P/E
    13.82
    Quality & Moat
    14.16%
    ROIC
    1.95%
    9.31%
    ROE
    13.17%
    47.95%
    Gross Margin
    82.27%
    23.13
    PEG Ratio
    0.68
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.26
    Debt / Equity
    6.79
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.38
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    3.19%
    Dividend Yield
    1.95%
    EXE: 5Ties: 1GS: 3
    EXEGS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EXE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EXE
    $7.27
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.88B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$13.69B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EXE
    26.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 26.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $100.77
    Fair Value: $136.49
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GS
    63.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 63.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $903.27
    Fair Value: $2479.85
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EXE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

    +4.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market above historical growth — verify catalysts.

    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EXE
    21/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GS
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EXE
    -2.06
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EXE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 94.6%Retail & Other 5.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,184
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GS
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 23.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,722
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EXE
    2
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $739,630
    WICHTERICH MICHAEL A.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $215,000
    @ $107.50 · 2026-03-06
    GALLAGHER MATTHEW
    Director
    $100,660
    @ $100.66 · 2026-02-19
    VIETS JOSHUA J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $184,320
    @ $92.16 · 2025-08-18
    DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J. JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $239,650
    @ $95.86 · 2025-08-15
    DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J. JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $248,750
    @ $99.50 · 2025-03-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    FLAHERTY MARK A
    Director
    $29,545
    @ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EXE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    KEHR CATHERINE A
    Director
    $4.34M
    @ $99.58 · 2024-11-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GS
    3
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $62.06M
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.51M
    @ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $457.32 · 2024-05-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EXE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(51/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(59/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EXE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
    GS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
    View EXE Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis
    EXE vs GS: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io