Compare StocksEXE vs GOOGL

Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

EXE
Expand Energy Corporation
$100.77
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$383.25

Rewards

EXE
    GOOGL
    • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    EXE
    • ROIC has declined by 14.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Expand Energy Corporation scores only 21/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 78% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    GOOGL
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EXE
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $1.70B
    Free Cash Flow
    $73.27B
    7.03%
    FCF Yield
    1.58%
    7.50
    Trailing P/E
    29.41
    10.32
    Forward P/E
    26.89
    Quality & Moat
    14.16%
    ROIC
    20.98%
    9.31%
    ROE
    27.61%
    47.95%
    Gross Margin
    60.37%
    23.13
    PEG Ratio
    0.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.26
    Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.38
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.19
    3.19%
    Dividend Yield
    0.22%
    EXE: 4Ties: 1GOOGL: 7
    EXEGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EXE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EXE
    $7.27
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.88B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$13.69B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EXE
    26.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 26.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $100.77
    Fair Value: $136.49
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    239.6% Overvalued
    Price is 239.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $383.25
    Fair Value: $112.84
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EXE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

    +4.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market above historical growth — verify catalysts.

    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $383?

    +23.4%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EXE
    21/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EXE
    -2.06
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EXE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 94.6%Retail & Other 5.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,184
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,168
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EXE
    2
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $739,630
    WICHTERICH MICHAEL A.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $215,000
    @ $107.50 · 2026-03-06
    GALLAGHER MATTHEW
    Director
    $100,660
    @ $100.66 · 2026-02-19
    VIETS JOSHUA J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $184,320
    @ $92.16 · 2025-08-18
    DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J. JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $239,650
    @ $95.86 · 2025-08-15
    DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J. JR.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $248,750
    @ $99.50 · 2025-03-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EXE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    KEHR CATHERINE A
    Director
    $4.34M
    @ $99.58 · 2024-11-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EXE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(51/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(72/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EXE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
    View EXE Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis