Compare StocksEW vs PFE

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, EW is overvalued at $86, with a DCF intrinsic value of $58 and a margin of safety of -48%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$86.07
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

EW
  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 77.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

EW
  • Trailing P/E of 51.2x is 70% above the historical average of 30.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.07 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 8 insider sales totaling $1.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EW
PFE
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
51.23
Trailing P/E
19.09
25.50
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
13.92%
ROIC
10.19%
10.39%
ROE
8.31%
77.84%
Gross Margin
74.80%
2.07
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.49
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
0.00%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
EW: 5Ties: 2PFE: 3
EWPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EW
$0.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$6.65B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.12B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EW
47.7% Overvalued
Price is 47.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $86.07
Fair Value: $58.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EW

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EW
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EW
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.4%Retail & Other 5.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,904
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EW
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EW
8
Sells (3M)
30
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $16.43M
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$12,588
@ $86.22 · 2026-07-30
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$818,958
@ $85.06 · 2026-07-28
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$56,762
@ $91.70 · 2026-07-10
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$56,577
@ $91.40 · 2026-06-30
DAHL ANDREW M
Officer
$48,853
@ $86.16 · 2026-05-29
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$126,905
@ $84.60 · 2026-05-22
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$50,307
@ $81.14 · 2026-05-18
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$47,280
@ $79.73 · 2026-05-11
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$170,160
@ $83.49 · 2026-05-04
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.04M
@ $80.04 · 2026-04-09
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$82,523
@ $80.98 · 2026-04-06
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$1.82M
@ $80.16 · 2026-04-02
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.10M
@ $84.92 · 2026-03-11
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$87,004
@ $85.38 · 2026-03-11
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$974,430
@ $85.93 · 2026-03-02
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$2.01M
@ $83.84 · 2026-02-25
ZOVIGHIAN BERNARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.72M
@ $76.67 · 2026-02-12
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$87,332
@ $85.70 · 2026-01-09
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$971,429
@ $85.66 · 2026-01-06
STONE HEISZ LESLIE
Director
$218,120
@ $83.41 · 2025-12-12
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$953,748
@ $83.76 · 2025-12-12
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$85,625
@ $84.03 · 2025-12-12
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$168,750
@ $84.38 · 2025-12-11
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$950,581
@ $83.83 · 2025-12-10
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$650,412
@ $84.47 · 2025-12-09
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$50,144
@ $86.01 · 2025-12-08
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.08M
@ $83.08 · 2025-11-10
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$84,196
@ $82.55 · 2025-11-10
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$204,865
@ $81.95 · 2025-08-25
WOOD LARRY L
Officer
$698,679
@ $78.06 · 2025-08-18
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$326,900
@ $79.46 · 2025-07-28
WOOD LARRY L
Officer
$673,268
@ $75.23 · 2025-06-16
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$198,911
@ $77.40 · 2025-06-02
CHOPRA DAVEEN
Officer
$112,612
@ $75.07 · 2025-05-22
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$837,035
@ $74.40 · 2025-05-09
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$24,560
@ $74.42 · 2025-05-09
MARKOWITZ WAYNE
Officer
$20,121
@ $75.08 · 2025-05-07
ZOVIGHIAN BERNARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$447,977
@ $74.91 · 2025-05-05
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$663,196
@ $69.81 · 2025-04-14
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$21,183
@ $70.61 · 2025-04-08
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$797,267
@ $70.87 · 2025-03-26
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$645,624
@ $67.96 · 2025-03-13
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$27,792
@ $69.48 · 2025-03-10
ZOVIGHIAN BERNARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$428,448
@ $69.51 · 2025-03-10
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$796,327
@ $70.78 · 2025-02-28
LORANGER STEVEN R
Director
$438,576
@ $76.42 · 2025-02-14
STONE HEISZ LESLIE
Director
$435,371
@ $75.86 · 2025-02-13
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$492,363
@ $75.75 · 2025-02-13
ULLEM SCOTT B
Chief Financial Officer
$852,272
@ $75.76 · 2025-02-13
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$38,170
@ $76.34 · 2025-02-13
BOBO DONALD E JR
Officer
$343,736
@ $68.75 · 2025-01-16
LIPPIS DANIEL J
Officer
$34,382
@ $68.76 · 2025-01-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View EW Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EW vs PFE

Is Edwards Lifesciences Corporation or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to EW's -47.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $58 vs. $86).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation or Pfizer, Inc.?

EW scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer, Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EW scores 11.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation or Pfizer, Inc.?

EW earns 13.9% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

EW vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io