SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › EVRG vs PFE

Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

EVRG
Evergy, Inc.
$81.06
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41

Rewards

EVRG
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.30 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

EVRG
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.71 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.80 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EVRG
PFE
Valuation
$-862.12M
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
-4.62%
FCF Yield
8.61%
22.15
Trailing P/E
20.15
17.80
Forward P/E
9.69
Quality & Moat
3.26%
ROIC
7.67%
8.33%
ROE
8.96%
52.27%
Gross Margin
75.81%
4.71
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.50
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.61
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
3.43%
Dividend Yield
6.28%
EVRG: 0Ties: 1PFE: 10
EVRGPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EVRG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EVRG
$3.30
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$681.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$2.25B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EVRG
747.8% Overvalued
Price is 747.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $81.06
Fair Value: $9.56
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EVRG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EVRG
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EVRG
-0.21
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EVRG
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.2%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,209
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,692
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EVRG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EVRG
3
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.47M
KING CHARLES LYNN
Chief Technology Officer
$200,533
@ $82.19 · 2026-03-12
HUMPHREY HEATHER A. SUVE
General Counsel
$301,527
@ $82.61 · 2026-03-10
MURTLOW ANN D.
Director
$234,422
@ $82.34 · 2026-02-25
ELWELL LESLEY LISSETTE
Officer
$578,640
@ $72.33 · 2025-09-15
LAWRENCE SANDRA A.J.
Director
$156,500
@ $67.72 · 2025-06-11
KING CHARLES LYNN
Chief Technology Officer
$150,008
@ $65.22 · 2024-11-27
BRYANT KEVIN E.
Officer
$3.03M
@ $62.93 · 2024-11-13
CAISLEY CHARLES A
Officer
$550,753
@ $59.63 · 2024-09-03
HUMPHREY HEATHER A. SUVE
General Counsel
$196,809
@ $58.80 · 2024-08-27
LAWRENCE SANDRA A.J.
Director
$166,464
@ $58.47 · 2024-08-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EVRG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EVRG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View EVRG Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis
Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io