Compare Stocks › ETR vs V
Entergy Corporation (ETR) vs Visa Inc. (V)
ETR
Entergy Corporation
$103.94
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$299.71
Rewards
ETR
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.33 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
V
- ★Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
Risks
ETR
- ⚠Entergy Corporation scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
- ⚠Trailing P/E of 26.6x is 27% above the historical average of 21.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
- ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
V
- ⚠Insiders have sold $3.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →ETR
V
Valuation
$-3.62B
Free Cash Flow
$22.03B
-7.68%
FCF Yield
3.81%
26.58
Trailing P/E
28.17
21.11
Forward P/E
20.62
Quality & Moat
4.00%
ROIC
37.25%
10.20%
ROE
51.73%
47.72%
Gross Margin
97.78%
N/A
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
1.82
Debt / Equity
0.55
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.27
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.16
2.39%
Dividend Yield
0.89%
ETR: 2Ties: 2V: 7
ETRV
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →ETR
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
V
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →ETR
$8.33
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.17B
Δ Market Cap
+$18.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →ETR
146.4% Overvalued
Price is 146.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $103.94
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $42.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
1.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 1.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $299.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $303.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →ETR
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
V
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $300?
+12.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.5%
The market implies +12.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.
Standard FCF implies +11.5%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →ETR
27/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →ETR
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →ETR
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,618
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 90.8%Retail & Other 8.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,908
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →ETR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $96,690
ROPP RALPH LEWIS
Director
$96,690
@ $96.69 · 2025-11-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →ETR
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $13.40M
HUDSON JOHN O. III
Officer
$1.05M
@ $104.79 · 2026-02-23
DINELLI JOHN C
Officer
$558,419
@ $103.95 · 2026-02-20
BROWN MARCUS V
Officer
$2.25M
@ $105.12 · 2026-02-13
CHAPMAN JASON
Chief Technology Officer
$1.79M
@ $104.02 · 2026-02-13
LANDREAUX LAURA R
Officer
$234,150
@ $93.66 · 2025-11-21
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$495,624
@ $96.50 · 2025-11-04
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$481,950
@ $96.39 · 2025-11-04
CHAPMAN JASON
Officer
$483,050
@ $96.61 · 2025-11-03
ELLIS BRIAN W
Director
$4,133
@ $96.12 · 2025-10-31
CHAPMAN JASON
Chief Technology Officer
$727,426
@ $96.45 · 2025-10-30
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$13,195
@ $91.00 · 2025-08-13
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$403,902
@ $90.50 · 2025-07-31
COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
Chief Operating Officer
$1.91M
@ $90.20 · 2025-07-30
COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
Chief Operating Officer
$660,000
@ $88.00 · 2025-07-22
ELLIS BRIAN W
Director
$53,261
@ $82.32 · 2025-05-30
FONTAN KIMBERLY A.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.29M
@ $81.95 · 2025-05-29
RODRIGUEZ DEANNA D
Officer
$266,101
@ $82.64 · 2025-03-06
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$1.56M
@ $87.34 · 2025-03-04
NORGEOT PETER S JR
Chief Operating Officer
$1.68M
@ $86.78 · 2025-02-28
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$1.06M
@ $85.36 · 2025-02-25
CHAPMAN JASON
Officer
$294,645
@ $85.01 · 2025-02-24
MAY PHILLIP R JR
Officer
$3.00M
@ $85.28 · 2025-02-21
VIAMONTES ELIECER
Officer
$1.81M
@ $85.62 · 2025-02-20
BROWN MARCUS V
General Counsel
$13.73M
@ $87.06 · 2025-02-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
2
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $101.23M
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$7.01M
@ $277.15 · 2024-05-15
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$250,472
@ $275.55 · 2024-04-26
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.30M
@ $280.36 · 2024-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →ETR
😐Neutral(60/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
😨Fear(36/100)
"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →ETR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
V
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)