Compare Stocks › ETR vs JPM
Entergy Corporation (ETR) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)
ETR
Entergy Corporation
$103.94
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$287.97
Rewards
ETR
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.33 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
JPM
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
Risks
ETR
- ⚠Entergy Corporation scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
- ⚠Trailing P/E of 26.6x is 27% above the historical average of 21.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
- ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
JPM
- ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
- ⚠JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
- ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →ETR
JPM
Valuation
$-3.62B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
-7.68%
FCF Yield
N/A
26.58
Trailing P/E
14.39
21.11
Forward P/E
12.26
Quality & Moat
4.00%
ROIC
5.32%
10.20%
ROE
N/A
47.72%
Gross Margin
0.00%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.82
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.27
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.39%
Dividend Yield
2.08%
ETR: 2Ties: 1JPM: 3
ETRJPM
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →ETR
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
JPM
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →ETR
$8.33
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.17B
Δ Market Cap
+$18.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JPM
$3.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$475.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →ETR
146.4% Overvalued
Price is 146.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $103.94
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $42.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
46.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $287.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $538.22
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →ETR
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
JPM
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →ETR
27/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
JPM
18/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →ETR
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →ETR
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,618
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.6%
No. of Institutional Holders6,240
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →ETR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $96,690
ROPP RALPH LEWIS
Director
$96,690
@ $96.69 · 2025-11-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →ETR
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $13.40M
HUDSON JOHN O. III
Officer
$1.05M
@ $104.79 · 2026-02-23
DINELLI JOHN C
Officer
$558,419
@ $103.95 · 2026-02-20
BROWN MARCUS V
Officer
$2.25M
@ $105.12 · 2026-02-13
CHAPMAN JASON
Chief Technology Officer
$1.79M
@ $104.02 · 2026-02-13
LANDREAUX LAURA R
Officer
$234,150
@ $93.66 · 2025-11-21
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$495,624
@ $96.50 · 2025-11-04
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$481,950
@ $96.39 · 2025-11-04
CHAPMAN JASON
Officer
$483,050
@ $96.61 · 2025-11-03
ELLIS BRIAN W
Director
$4,133
@ $96.12 · 2025-10-31
CHAPMAN JASON
Chief Technology Officer
$727,426
@ $96.45 · 2025-10-30
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$13,195
@ $91.00 · 2025-08-13
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$403,902
@ $90.50 · 2025-07-31
COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
Chief Operating Officer
$1.91M
@ $90.20 · 2025-07-30
COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
Chief Operating Officer
$660,000
@ $88.00 · 2025-07-22
ELLIS BRIAN W
Director
$53,261
@ $82.32 · 2025-05-30
FONTAN KIMBERLY A.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.29M
@ $81.95 · 2025-05-29
RODRIGUEZ DEANNA D
Officer
$266,101
@ $82.64 · 2025-03-06
FISACKERLY HALEY R
Officer
$1.56M
@ $87.34 · 2025-03-04
NORGEOT PETER S JR
Chief Operating Officer
$1.68M
@ $86.78 · 2025-02-28
MINOR ANASTASIA
Officer
$1.06M
@ $85.36 · 2025-02-25
CHAPMAN JASON
Officer
$294,645
@ $85.01 · 2025-02-24
MAY PHILLIP R JR
Officer
$3.00M
@ $85.28 · 2025-02-21
VIAMONTES ELIECER
Officer
$1.81M
@ $85.62 · 2025-02-20
BROWN MARCUS V
General Counsel
$13.73M
@ $87.06 · 2025-02-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
12
Sells (3M)
30
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $104.76M
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$838,778
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.34M
@ $253.97 · 2025-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.81M
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$886,565
@ $253.96 · 2025-01-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →ETR
😐Neutral(60/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
😐Neutral(51/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →ETR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
JPM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)