Compare StocksETR vs INTC

Entergy Corporation (ETR) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

ETR
Entergy Corporation
$103.94
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

ETR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.33 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    ETR
    • Entergy Corporation scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Trailing P/E of 26.6x is 27% above the historical average of 21.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ETR
    INTC
    Valuation
    $-3.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    -7.68%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    26.58
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    21.11
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    4.00%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    10.20%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    47.72%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.82
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.27
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    2.39%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    ETR: 5Ties: 1INTC: 3
    ETRINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ETR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ETR
    $8.33
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.17B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$18.05B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ETR
    146.4% Overvalued
    Price is 146.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $103.94
    Fair Value: $42.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ETR

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ETR
    27/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ETR
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ETR
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,618
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ETR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $96,690
    ROPP RALPH LEWIS
    Director
    $96,690
    @ $96.69 · 2025-11-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ETR
    4
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $13.40M
    HUDSON JOHN O. III
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $104.79 · 2026-02-23
    DINELLI JOHN C
    Officer
    $558,419
    @ $103.95 · 2026-02-20
    BROWN MARCUS V
    Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $105.12 · 2026-02-13
    CHAPMAN JASON
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $104.02 · 2026-02-13
    LANDREAUX LAURA R
    Officer
    $234,150
    @ $93.66 · 2025-11-21
    FISACKERLY HALEY R
    Officer
    $495,624
    @ $96.50 · 2025-11-04
    MINOR ANASTASIA
    Officer
    $481,950
    @ $96.39 · 2025-11-04
    CHAPMAN JASON
    Officer
    $483,050
    @ $96.61 · 2025-11-03
    ELLIS BRIAN W
    Director
    $4,133
    @ $96.12 · 2025-10-31
    CHAPMAN JASON
    Chief Technology Officer
    $727,426
    @ $96.45 · 2025-10-30
    MINOR ANASTASIA
    Officer
    $13,195
    @ $91.00 · 2025-08-13
    FISACKERLY HALEY R
    Officer
    $403,902
    @ $90.50 · 2025-07-31
    COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $90.20 · 2025-07-30
    COOK-NELSON KIMBERLY
    Chief Operating Officer
    $660,000
    @ $88.00 · 2025-07-22
    ELLIS BRIAN W
    Director
    $53,261
    @ $82.32 · 2025-05-30
    FONTAN KIMBERLY A.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.29M
    @ $81.95 · 2025-05-29
    RODRIGUEZ DEANNA D
    Officer
    $266,101
    @ $82.64 · 2025-03-06
    FISACKERLY HALEY R
    Officer
    $1.56M
    @ $87.34 · 2025-03-04
    NORGEOT PETER S JR
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $86.78 · 2025-02-28
    MINOR ANASTASIA
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $85.36 · 2025-02-25
    CHAPMAN JASON
    Officer
    $294,645
    @ $85.01 · 2025-02-24
    MAY PHILLIP R JR
    Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $85.28 · 2025-02-21
    VIAMONTES ELIECER
    Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $85.62 · 2025-02-20
    BROWN MARCUS V
    General Counsel
    $13.73M
    @ $87.06 · 2025-02-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ETR
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ETR
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View ETR Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis