Compare StocksESS vs PFE

Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
$263.35
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$26.33

Rewards

ESS
  • Gross margin of 68.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.53% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 9.0% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

ESS
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 7.02 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ESS
PFE
Valuation
$983.00M
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
5.42%
FCF Yield
8.97%
29.59
Trailing P/E
19.36
44.40
Forward P/E
9.36
Quality & Moat
4.38%
ROIC
7.67%
11.90%
ROE
8.96%
68.88%
Gross Margin
75.81%
7.02
PEG Ratio
13.77
Balance Sheet Safety
1.22
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.33
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
3.91%
Dividend Yield
6.53%
ESS: 2Ties: 1PFE: 9
ESSPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ESS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ESS
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-44.5M
Δ Market Cap
+$3.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ESS
406.5% Overvalued
Price is 406.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $263.35
Fair Value: $51.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
130.7% Overvalued
Price is 130.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $26.33
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ESS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $263?

+16.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.0%

The market implies +16.2% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +11.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $26?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.0%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ESS
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ESS
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ESS
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 103.6%
No. of Institutional Holders925
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.9%Retail & Other 32.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,687
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ESS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ESS
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
KASARIS MARY
Director
$842,240
@ $300.80 · 2025-03-11
KLEIMAN ANGELA L
Chief Executive Officer
$1.68M
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-04
GUERICKE KEITH R
Director
$2.30M
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-03
PAK BARBARA
Chief Financial Officer
$1.99M
@ $314.79 · 2025-03-03
MORRISON ANNE
General Counsel
$809,325
@ $314.79 · 2025-03-03
JOHNSON AMAL M
Director
$2.31M
@ $316.31 · 2024-09-17
KLEIMAN ANGELA L
Chief Executive Officer
$2.55M
@ $315.10 · 2024-09-16
MORRISON ANNE
General Counsel
$809,325
@ $314.79 · 2024-09-16
JOHNSON AMAL M
Director
$735,900
@ $300.00 · 2024-08-30
KLEIMAN ANGELA L
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $278.27 · 2024-06-21
GUERICKE KEITH R
Director
$2.75M
@ $274.57 · 2024-06-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ESS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ESS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View ESS Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis
ESS vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io