Compare Stocks › ES vs MS

Eversource Energy (ES) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ES is overvalued at $69, with a DCF intrinsic value of $15 and a margin of safety of -370%. MS is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $314 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

ES
Eversource Energy
$68.55
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$184.30

Rewards

ES
    MS
    • ★Gross margin of 87.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • ★Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

    Risks

    ES
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.25 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠High leverage (1.70x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    MS
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • ⚠13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ES
    MS
    Valuation
    $811.96M
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    3.14%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    17.76
    Trailing P/E
    14.62
    13.91
    Forward P/E
    13.50
    Quality & Moat
    5.71%
    ROIC
    3.47%
    9.02%
    ROE
    13.84%
    52.75%
    Gross Margin
    87.31%
    2.25
    PEG Ratio
    1.61
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.70
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.67
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    4.60%
    Dividend Yield
    2.50%
    ES: 2Ties: 2MS: 5
    ESMS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ES

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ES
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-974.3M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-3.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MS
    $6.65
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $20.84B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$138.59B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ES
    370.3% Overvalued
    Price is 370.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $68.55
    Fair Value: $14.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MS
    41.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $184.30
    Fair Value: $313.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ES

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $69?

    +14.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +24.1%

    The market implies +14.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +24.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    MS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ES
    40/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MS
    80/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ES
    -2.62
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MS
    -2.09
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ES
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.5%Retail & Other 11.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,523
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MS
    Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.5%Retail & Other 12.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,458
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ES
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $49,864
    MUDGE WARREN ROBERT
    Trustee
    $49,864
    @ $66.49 · 2026-05-08
    KEANE LORETTA D.
    Trustee
    $249,739
    @ $66.07 · 2025-08-22
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    PETERSON DOUGLAS L
    Director
    $5,630
    @ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ES
    1
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.62M
    CONNER PENELOPE M
    Officer
    $213,900
    @ $71.30 · 2026-08-25
    BUTLER GREGORY B
    General Counsel
    $489,160
    @ $69.88 · 2026-06-04
    CONNER PENELOPE M
    Officer
    $105,000
    @ $75.00 · 2026-03-04
    CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
    Trustee
    $193,239
    @ $74.87 · 2026-02-24
    MOREIRA JOHN M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $576,420
    @ $73.90 · 2026-02-19
    FORRY LINDA DORCENA
    Trustee
    $188,559
    @ $73.06 · 2026-02-18
    WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
    Trustee
    $189,239
    @ $73.32 · 2026-02-17
    BUTLER GREGORY B
    General Counsel
    $365,400
    @ $73.08 · 2025-11-12
    HUNT JAMES W III
    Officer
    $300,489
    @ $72.78 · 2025-11-07
    CONNER PENELOPE M
    Officer
    $238,212
    @ $64.38 · 2025-08-29
    CONNER PENELOPE M
    Officer
    $166,400
    @ $64.00 · 2025-05-20
    BUTLER GREGORY B
    General Counsel
    $752,148
    @ $62.68 · 2025-02-28
    CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
    Trustee
    $492,062
    @ $63.50 · 2025-02-26
    CONNER PENELOPE M
    Officer
    $63,630
    @ $63.63 · 2025-02-26
    BUTH JAY S
    Officer
    $61,735
    @ $62.99 · 2025-02-21
    FORRY LINDA DORCENA
    Trustee
    $63,050
    @ $63.05 · 2025-02-20
    WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
    Trustee
    $192,508
    @ $62.26 · 2025-02-19
    FORRY LINDA DORCENA
    Trustee
    $127,110
    @ $60.76 · 2025-02-18
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MS
    0
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $48.28M
    SCHAPIRO MARY L
    Director
    $212,055
    @ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $5.21M
    @ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $2.78M
    @ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $9.74M
    @ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $6.02M
    @ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
    YESHAYA SHARON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
    SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
    Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $3.97M
    @ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $1.44M
    @ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $5.57M
    @ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
    PICK EDWARD N.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.43M
    @ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
    SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
    Officer
    $2.81M
    @ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.69M
    @ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $4.09M
    @ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $3.70M
    @ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
    HERZ ROBERT H
    Director
    $95,459
    @ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $4.80M
    @ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
    CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
    Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
    GROSSMAN ERIC F
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
    SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
    President
    $5.00M
    @ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
    AKRAM RAJA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.38M
    @ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
    PIZZI MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.52M
    @ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
    SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
    President
    $4.20M
    @ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ES
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(56/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ES
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
    MS
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    View ES Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ES vs MS

    Is Eversource Energy or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $314 vs. price $184), compared to ES's -370.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $15 vs. $69).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Eversource Energy or Morgan Stanley?▼

    MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while ES scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?▼

    MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ES scores 0.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Eversource Energy or Morgan Stanley?▼

    ES earns 5.7% ROIC versus MS's 3.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Eversource Energy's or Morgan Stanley's?▼

    MS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to ES's 69/100 (Safe). MS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.