Compare Stocks › ES vs JPM
Eversource Energy (ES) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)
ES
Eversource Energy
$69.62
VS
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$287.97
Rewards
ES
- ★Trailing P/E of 15.3x is 25% below the historical average of 20.3x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
- ★PEG ratio of 0.03 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
JPM
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
Risks
ES
- ⚠FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
- ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
- ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.73 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
JPM
- ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
- ⚠JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
- ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →ES
JPM
Valuation
$761.49M
Free Cash Flow
N/A
2.91%
FCF Yield
N/A
15.27
Trailing P/E
14.39
13.46
Forward P/E
12.26
Quality & Moat
5.08%
ROIC
5.32%
10.35%
ROE
N/A
53.62%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.03
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
1.85
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
4.52%
Dividend Yield
2.08%
ES: 2Ties: 2JPM: 2
ESJPM
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →ES
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
JPM
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →ES
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-974.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JPM
$3.95
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$120.20B
Δ Market Cap
+$475.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →ES
914.2% Overvalued
Price is 914.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $69.62
Strongly undervalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $6.86
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JPM
46.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $287.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $538.22
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →ES
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $70?
+14.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.6%
The market implies +14.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
JPM
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →ES
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
JPM
18/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →ES
-2.62
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JPM
-2.17
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →ES
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 12.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,389
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JPM
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.6%
No. of Institutional Holders6,239
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →ES
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,739
KEANE LORETTA D.
Trustee
$249,739
@ $66.07 · 2025-08-22
NOVA DANIEL J.
Trustee
$38,681
@ $56.88 · 2024-03-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JPM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →ES
5
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.32M
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$105,000
@ $75.00 · 2026-03-04
CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
Trustee
$193,239
@ $74.87 · 2026-02-24
MOREIRA JOHN M.
Chief Financial Officer
$576,420
@ $73.90 · 2026-02-19
FORRY LINDA DORCENA
Trustee
$188,559
@ $73.06 · 2026-02-18
WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
Trustee
$189,239
@ $73.32 · 2026-02-17
BUTLER GREGORY B
General Counsel
$365,400
@ $73.08 · 2025-11-12
HUNT JAMES W III
Officer
$300,489
@ $72.78 · 2025-11-07
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$238,212
@ $64.38 · 2025-08-29
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$166,400
@ $64.00 · 2025-05-20
BUTLER GREGORY B
General Counsel
$752,148
@ $62.68 · 2025-02-28
CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
Trustee
$492,062
@ $63.50 · 2025-02-26
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$63,630
@ $63.63 · 2025-02-26
BUTH JAY S
Officer
$61,735
@ $62.99 · 2025-02-21
FORRY LINDA DORCENA
Trustee
$63,050
@ $63.05 · 2025-02-20
WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
Trustee
$192,508
@ $62.26 · 2025-02-19
FORRY LINDA DORCENA
Trustee
$127,110
@ $60.76 · 2025-02-18
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$33,452
@ $66.90 · 2024-08-30
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$53,382
@ $65.50 · 2024-08-13
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$32,468
@ $64.94 · 2024-08-09
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$158,633
@ $58.75 · 2024-05-31
BUTLER GREGORY B
General Counsel
$562,010
@ $56.20 · 2024-05-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JPM
12
Sells (3M)
30
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $104.76M
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$132,684
@ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$15.36M
@ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$886,157
@ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$627,207
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.07M
@ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.68M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$904,890
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$640,295
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.79M
@ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$1.09M
@ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$2.30M
@ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$301,311
@ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.83M
@ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.39M
@ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.61M
@ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
LAKE MARIANNE
Officer
$3.28M
@ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$2.71M
@ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$3.69M
@ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$3.29M
@ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.54M
@ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
BARNUM JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$10.03M
@ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
BAMMANN LINDA B.
Director
$2.38M
@ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
DIMON JAMES
Chief Executive Officer
$31.50M
@ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$308,652
@ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.06M
@ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$6.18M
@ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$506,698
@ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
LEOPOLD ROBIN
Officer
$337,610
@ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.15M
@ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
ROHRBAUGH TROY L
Officer
$10.12M
@ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
BEER LORI A
Chief Technology Officer
$554,054
@ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$919,371
@ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.47M
@ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$971,646
@ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
General Counsel
$838,778
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
ERDOES MARY E.
Officer
$1.34M
@ $253.97 · 2025-01-16
BACON ASHLEY
Officer
$1.81M
@ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
PETNO DOUGLAS B
Officer
$886,565
@ $253.96 · 2025-01-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →ES
😐Neutral(50/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JPM
😐Neutral(51/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →ES
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
JPM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)