Compare StocksES vs INTU

Eversource Energy (ES) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, ES is overvalued at $68, with a DCF intrinsic value of $11 and a margin of safety of -502%. INTU is undervalued at $321, with an intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 43%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

ES
Eversource Energy
$68.34
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$320.98

Rewards

ES
    INTU
    • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    ES
    • PEG ratio of 2.34 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (1.70x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTU

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      ES
      INTU
      Valuation
      $811.96M
      Free Cash Flow
      $8.62B
      3.15%
      FCF Yield
      10.05%
      17.75
      Trailing P/E
      19.51
      13.90
      Forward P/E
      11.74
      Quality & Moat
      5.71%
      ROIC
      10.90%
      9.02%
      ROE
      23.60%
      52.75%
      Gross Margin
      80.98%
      2.34
      PEG Ratio
      1.08
      Balance Sheet Safety
      1.70
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.06
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      5.67
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.18
      4.64%
      Dividend Yield
      1.74%
      ES: 2Ties: 1INTU: 9
      ESINTU

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      ES

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      INTU

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      ES
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-974.3M
      Δ Market Cap
      $-3.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      INTU
      $-11.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $7.83B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-89.13B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      ES
      501.9% Overvalued
      Price is 501.9% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $68.34
      Fair Value: $11.35
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      INTU
      43.2% Margin of Safety
      Price is 43.2% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $320.98
      Fair Value: $565.45
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      ES

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $68?

      +14.0%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +24.1%

      The market implies +14.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +24.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      INTU

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $321?

      +5.3%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -1.7%

      The market implies +5.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      ES
      40/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      INTU
      94/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      ES
      -2.62
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      INTU
      -2.98
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      ES
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.2%Retail & Other 11.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,524
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      INTU
      Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,541
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      ES
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $49,864
      MUDGE WARREN ROBERT
      Trustee
      $49,864
      @ $66.49 · 2026-05-08
      KEANE LORETTA D.
      Trustee
      $249,739
      @ $66.07 · 2025-08-22
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      INTU
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $541,665
      PRABHU VASANT M.
      Director
      $541,665
      @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      ES
      1
      Sells (3M)
      9
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $2.62M
      CONNER PENELOPE M
      Officer
      $213,900
      @ $71.30 · 2026-08-25
      BUTLER GREGORY B
      General Counsel
      $489,160
      @ $69.88 · 2026-06-04
      CONNER PENELOPE M
      Officer
      $105,000
      @ $75.00 · 2026-03-04
      CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
      Trustee
      $193,239
      @ $74.87 · 2026-02-24
      MOREIRA JOHN M.
      Chief Financial Officer
      $576,420
      @ $73.90 · 2026-02-19
      FORRY LINDA DORCENA
      Trustee
      $188,559
      @ $73.06 · 2026-02-18
      WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
      Trustee
      $189,239
      @ $73.32 · 2026-02-17
      BUTLER GREGORY B
      General Counsel
      $365,400
      @ $73.08 · 2025-11-12
      HUNT JAMES W III
      Officer
      $300,489
      @ $72.78 · 2025-11-07
      CONNER PENELOPE M
      Officer
      $238,212
      @ $64.38 · 2025-08-29
      CONNER PENELOPE M
      Officer
      $166,400
      @ $64.00 · 2025-05-20
      BUTLER GREGORY B
      General Counsel
      $752,148
      @ $62.68 · 2025-02-28
      CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
      Trustee
      $492,062
      @ $63.50 · 2025-02-26
      CONNER PENELOPE M
      Officer
      $63,630
      @ $63.63 · 2025-02-26
      BUTH JAY S
      Officer
      $61,735
      @ $62.99 · 2025-02-21
      FORRY LINDA DORCENA
      Trustee
      $63,050
      @ $63.05 · 2025-02-20
      WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
      Trustee
      $192,508
      @ $62.26 · 2025-02-19
      FORRY LINDA DORCENA
      Trustee
      $127,110
      @ $60.76 · 2025-02-18
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      INTU
      3
      Sells (3M)
      11
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $4.34M
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $92,728
      @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $314,288
      @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $74,499
      @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $80,145
      @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $289,448
      @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $457,046
      @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $840,097
      @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $741,172
      @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $219,763
      @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $435,354
      @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $792,160
      @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $665,951
      @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $27,930
      @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $255,887
      @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $521,891
      @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $689,400
      @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.03M
      @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.25M
      @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $887,583
      @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $1.36M
      @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $26.12M
      @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $19.29M
      @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $30.46M
      @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $11.66M
      @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $340,143
      @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
      MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
      General Counsel
      $12.18M
      @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $5.00M
      @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $4.43M
      @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
      BURTON EVE B
      Director
      $1.02M
      @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $667,838
      @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $814,350
      @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $2.94M
      @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $68,506
      @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      ES
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(50/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      INTU
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(33/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      ES
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
      INTU
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
      View ES Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: ES vs INTU

      Is Eversource Energy or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 43.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $321), compared to ES's -501.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $11 vs. $68).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Eversource Energy or Intuit Inc.?

      INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while ES scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Eversource Energy in financial distress?

      ES's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Eversource Energy or Intuit Inc.?

      Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Eversource Energy's 3.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Eversource Energy or Intuit Inc.?

      INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus ES's 5.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Eversource Energy's or Intuit Inc.'s?

      INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ES's 69/100 (Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.