Compare StocksES vs GOOGL

Eversource Energy (ES) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

ES
Eversource Energy
$69.62
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13

Rewards

ES
  • Trailing P/E of 15.3x is 25% below the historical average of 20.3x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.03 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

ES
  • FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.73 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ES
GOOGL
Valuation
$761.49M
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
2.91%
FCF Yield
1.97%
15.27
Trailing P/E
28.41
13.46
Forward P/E
22.88
Quality & Moat
5.08%
ROIC
20.83%
10.35%
ROE
31.83%
53.62%
Gross Margin
59.65%
0.03
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
1.85
Debt / Equity
0.16
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.40
4.52%
Dividend Yield
0.27%
ES: 5Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
ESGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ES

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ES
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-974.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ES
914.2% Overvalued
Price is 914.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $69.62
Fair Value: $6.86
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ES

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $70?

+14.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.6%

The market implies +14.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ES
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ES
-2.62
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ES
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 12.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,389
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ES
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $249,739
KEANE LORETTA D.
Trustee
$249,739
@ $66.07 · 2025-08-22
NOVA DANIEL J.
Trustee
$38,681
@ $56.88 · 2024-03-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ES
5
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.32M
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$105,000
@ $75.00 · 2026-03-04
CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
Trustee
$193,239
@ $74.87 · 2026-02-24
MOREIRA JOHN M.
Chief Financial Officer
$576,420
@ $73.90 · 2026-02-19
FORRY LINDA DORCENA
Trustee
$188,559
@ $73.06 · 2026-02-18
WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
Trustee
$189,239
@ $73.32 · 2026-02-17
BUTLER GREGORY B
General Counsel
$365,400
@ $73.08 · 2025-11-12
HUNT JAMES W III
Officer
$300,489
@ $72.78 · 2025-11-07
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$238,212
@ $64.38 · 2025-08-29
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$166,400
@ $64.00 · 2025-05-20
BUTLER GREGORY B
General Counsel
$752,148
@ $62.68 · 2025-02-28
CLEVELAND COTTON MATHER
Trustee
$492,062
@ $63.50 · 2025-02-26
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$63,630
@ $63.63 · 2025-02-26
BUTH JAY S
Officer
$61,735
@ $62.99 · 2025-02-21
FORRY LINDA DORCENA
Trustee
$63,050
@ $63.05 · 2025-02-20
WILLIAMS FREDERICA M
Trustee
$192,508
@ $62.26 · 2025-02-19
FORRY LINDA DORCENA
Trustee
$127,110
@ $60.76 · 2025-02-18
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$33,452
@ $66.90 · 2024-08-30
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$53,382
@ $65.50 · 2024-08-13
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$32,468
@ $64.94 · 2024-08-09
CONNER PENELOPE M
Officer
$158,633
@ $58.75 · 2024-05-31
BUTLER GREGORY B
General Counsel
$562,010
@ $56.20 · 2024-05-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ES
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ES
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View ES Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis