Compare StocksEQT vs PFE

EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, EQT is overvalued at $53, with a DCF intrinsic value of $31 and a margin of safety of -74%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

EQT
EQT Corporation
$53.29
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

EQT
  • Gross margin of 80.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.91 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

EQT
  • ROIC has declined by 27.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • EQT Corporation scores only 4/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 71% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EQT
PFE
Valuation
$2.46B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
7.38%
FCF Yield
N/A
12.36
Trailing P/E
19.09
13.38
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
4.97%
ROIC
10.19%
11.08%
ROE
8.31%
80.75%
Gross Margin
74.80%
2.31
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.79
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
1.24%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
EQT: 6Ties: 1PFE: 4
EQTPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EQT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EQT
$6.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.09B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EQT
74.1% Overvalued
Price is 74.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $53.29
Fair Value: $30.60
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EQT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $53?

+4.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market above historical growth — verify catalysts.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EQT
4/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EQT
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EQT
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 93.6%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,526
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EQT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EQT
1
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $14.85M
RICE TOBY Z
Chief Executive Officer
$5.36M
@ $54.26 · 2026-06-08
BAILEY VICKY A
Director
$246,137
@ $59.80 · 2026-04-27
FENTON SARAH
Officer
$314,453
@ $64.49 · 2026-03-16
BOLEN J.E.B.
Officer
$491,248
@ $64.35 · 2026-03-12
EVANCHO LESLEY
Officer
$1.21M
@ $60.69 · 2026-03-03
KNOP JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$1.23M
@ $61.65 · 2026-02-27
JAMES TODD M.
Officer
$1.99M
@ $61.12 · 2026-02-23
FENTON SARAH
Officer
$227,474
@ $60.37 · 2026-02-20
JORDAN WILLIAM E
Officer
$3.49M
@ $60.63 · 2025-11-11
BOLEN J.E.B.
Officer
$75,067
@ $52.79 · 2025-10-28
BAILEY VICKY A
Director
$219,594
@ $51.56 · 2025-08-06
FENTON SARAH
Officer
$646,030
@ $51.94 · 2025-07-25
KNOP JEREMY
Chief Financial Officer
$368,016
@ $51.00 · 2025-04-28
KARAM THOMAS F
Director
$1.50M
@ $48.74 · 2025-03-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EQT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EQT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View EQT Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EQT vs PFE

Is EQT Corporation or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to EQT's -74.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $31 vs. $53).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, EQT Corporation or Pfizer, Inc.?

PFE scores 35/100 (None moat), while EQT scores 4/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer, Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EQT scores 1.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, EQT Corporation or Pfizer, Inc.?

PFE earns 10.2% ROIC versus EQT's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, EQT Corporation's or Pfizer, Inc.'s?

EQT's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). EQT has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.