Compare StocksEQT vs INTC

EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EQT
EQT Corporation
$64.68
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EQT
  • Gross margin of 78.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.89 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    EQT
    • ROIC has declined by 28.8 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • EQT Corporation scores only 4/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • FCF yield of 7.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EQT
    INTC
    Valuation
    $2.84B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    7.03%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    19.54
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    13.97
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    10.07%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    0.84%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    78.63%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.36
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.29
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.28
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.02%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EQT: 7Ties: 1INTC: 1
    EQTINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EQT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EQT
    $6.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.06B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$21.09B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EQT
    13.3% Overvalued
    Price is 13.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $64.68
    Fair Value: $57.08
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EQT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $65?

    +5.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market above historical growth — verify catalysts.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EQT
    4/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EQT
    -2.72
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EQT
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 94.6%Retail & Other 4.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,446
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EQT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EQT
    6
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.26M
    FENTON SARAH
    Officer
    $314,453
    @ $64.49 · 2026-03-16
    BOLEN J.E.B.
    Officer
    $491,248
    @ $64.35 · 2026-03-12
    EVANCHO LESLEY
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $60.69 · 2026-03-03
    KNOP JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $61.65 · 2026-02-27
    JAMES TODD M.
    Officer
    $1.99M
    @ $61.12 · 2026-02-23
    FENTON SARAH
    Officer
    $227,474
    @ $60.37 · 2026-02-20
    JORDAN WILLIAM E
    Officer
    $3.49M
    @ $60.63 · 2025-11-11
    BOLEN J.E.B.
    Officer
    $75,067
    @ $52.79 · 2025-10-28
    BAILEY VICKY A
    Director
    $219,594
    @ $51.56 · 2025-08-06
    FENTON SARAH
    Officer
    $646,030
    @ $51.94 · 2025-07-25
    KNOP JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $368,016
    @ $51.00 · 2025-04-28
    KARAM THOMAS F
    Director
    $1.50M
    @ $48.74 · 2025-03-11
    JORDAN WILLIAM E
    General Counsel
    $1.43M
    @ $40.72 · 2024-05-29
    EVANCHO LESLEY
    Officer
    $1.94M
    @ $41.29 · 2024-05-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EQT
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(68/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EQT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EQT Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io