Compare StocksEQR vs PFE

Equity Residential (EQR) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

EQR
Equity Residential
$59.31
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41

Rewards

EQR
  • Gross margin of 62.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 22% below the historical average of 26.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

EQR
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EQR
PFE
Valuation
$1.42B
Free Cash Flow
$13.43B
6.09%
FCF Yield
8.61%
20.17
Trailing P/E
20.15
39.42
Forward P/E
9.69
Quality & Moat
3.50%
ROIC
7.67%
9.81%
ROE
8.96%
62.88%
Gross Margin
75.81%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.74
Debt / Equity
0.78
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.48
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.10
4.67%
Dividend Yield
6.28%
EQR: 1Ties: 3PFE: 7
EQRPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EQR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EQR
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-71.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$1.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EQR
14.7% Overvalued
Price is 14.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $59.31
Fair Value: $51.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EQR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $59?

+12.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.2%

The market implies +12.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +9.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EQR
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EQR
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EQR
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 96.2%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,043
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EQR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GARECHANA ROBERT A
Chief Financial Officer
$279.00
@ $69.75 · 2025-03-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EQR
6
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $985,890
MANELIS MICHAEL L
Chief Operating Officer
$154,387
@ $63.56 · 2026-02-18
CARRAWAY CATHERINE
Officer
$47,606
@ $63.56 · 2026-02-18
KAUFMAN IAN
Officer
$57,776
@ $63.56 · 2026-02-18
MANELIS MICHAEL L
Chief Operating Officer
$375,474
@ $65.13 · 2026-02-10
GARECHANA ROBERT A
Chief Investment Officer
$236,878
@ $65.13 · 2026-02-10
CARRAWAY CATHERINE
Officer
$42,725
@ $65.13 · 2026-02-10
CARRAWAY CATHERINE
Officer
$71,044
@ $70.55 · 2025-05-01
MANELIS MICHAEL L
Chief Operating Officer
$683,761
@ $72.07 · 2025-02-06
FENSTER SCOTT J.
General Counsel
$384,800
@ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
GARECHANA ROBERT A
Chief Financial Officer
$309,426
@ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
BRACKENRIDGE ALEXANDER
Chief Operating Officer
$897,796
@ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
CARRAWAY CATHERINE
Officer
$60,891
@ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
KAUFMAN IAN
Officer
$46,263
@ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
STERRETT STEPHEN E
Director
$151,713
@ $72.21 · 2025-02-05
MANELIS MICHAEL L
Chief Operating Officer
$143,000
@ $71.50 · 2024-11-07
CARRAWAY CATHERINE
Officer
$74,200
@ $74.20 · 2024-08-28
BRACKENRIDGE ALEXANDER
Chief Investment Officer
$813,094
@ $72.52 · 2024-08-22
FENSTER SCOTT J.
General Counsel
$214,992
@ $72.00 · 2024-08-21
KAUFMAN IAN
Officer
$466,848
@ $72.00 · 2024-08-21
MANELIS MICHAEL L
Chief Operating Officer
$213,750
@ $71.25 · 2024-08-07
GARECHANA ROBERT A
Chief Financial Officer
$439,142
@ $69.08 · 2024-06-24
BYNOE LINDA WALKER
Director
$208,169
@ $64.23 · 2024-05-31
HABEN MARY KAY
Director
$212,221
@ $65.48 · 2024-04-26
BRACKENRIDGE ALEXANDER
Chief Investment Officer
$261,795
@ $65.01 · 2024-04-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EQR
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EQR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View EQR Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis
Equity Residential (EQR) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io