Compare StocksEQR vs INTC

Equity Residential (EQR) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EQR
Equity Residential
$59.31
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EQR
  • Gross margin of 62.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 22% below the historical average of 26.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
INTC

    Risks

    EQR
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EQR
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.42B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    6.09%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    20.17
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    39.42
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    3.50%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    9.81%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    62.88%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.74
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.48
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    4.67%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EQR: 6Ties: 1INTC: 2
    EQRINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EQR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EQR
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-71.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.49B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EQR
    14.7% Overvalued
    Price is 14.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $59.31
    Fair Value: $51.69
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EQR

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $59?

    +12.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.2%

    The market implies +12.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +9.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EQR
    60/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EQR
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EQR
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 96.2%Retail & Other 3.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,043
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EQR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GARECHANA ROBERT A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $279.00
    @ $69.75 · 2025-03-17
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EQR
    6
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $985,890
    MANELIS MICHAEL L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $154,387
    @ $63.56 · 2026-02-18
    CARRAWAY CATHERINE
    Officer
    $47,606
    @ $63.56 · 2026-02-18
    KAUFMAN IAN
    Officer
    $57,776
    @ $63.56 · 2026-02-18
    MANELIS MICHAEL L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $375,474
    @ $65.13 · 2026-02-10
    GARECHANA ROBERT A
    Chief Investment Officer
    $236,878
    @ $65.13 · 2026-02-10
    CARRAWAY CATHERINE
    Officer
    $42,725
    @ $65.13 · 2026-02-10
    CARRAWAY CATHERINE
    Officer
    $71,044
    @ $70.55 · 2025-05-01
    MANELIS MICHAEL L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $683,761
    @ $72.07 · 2025-02-06
    FENSTER SCOTT J.
    General Counsel
    $384,800
    @ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
    GARECHANA ROBERT A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $309,426
    @ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
    BRACKENRIDGE ALEXANDER
    Chief Operating Officer
    $897,796
    @ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
    CARRAWAY CATHERINE
    Officer
    $60,891
    @ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
    KAUFMAN IAN
    Officer
    $46,263
    @ $72.06 · 2025-02-06
    STERRETT STEPHEN E
    Director
    $151,713
    @ $72.21 · 2025-02-05
    MANELIS MICHAEL L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $143,000
    @ $71.50 · 2024-11-07
    CARRAWAY CATHERINE
    Officer
    $74,200
    @ $74.20 · 2024-08-28
    BRACKENRIDGE ALEXANDER
    Chief Investment Officer
    $813,094
    @ $72.52 · 2024-08-22
    FENSTER SCOTT J.
    General Counsel
    $214,992
    @ $72.00 · 2024-08-21
    KAUFMAN IAN
    Officer
    $466,848
    @ $72.00 · 2024-08-21
    MANELIS MICHAEL L
    Chief Operating Officer
    $213,750
    @ $71.25 · 2024-08-07
    GARECHANA ROBERT A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $439,142
    @ $69.08 · 2024-06-24
    BYNOE LINDA WALKER
    Director
    $208,169
    @ $64.23 · 2024-05-31
    HABEN MARY KAY
    Director
    $212,221
    @ $65.48 · 2024-04-26
    BRACKENRIDGE ALEXANDER
    Chief Investment Officer
    $261,795
    @ $65.01 · 2024-04-24
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EQR
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EQR
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EQR Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    Equity Residential (EQR) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io