Compare StocksEPAM vs TSLA

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
$112.33
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$390.82

Rewards

EPAM
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TSLA
  • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

EPAM
    TSLA
    • ROIC has declined by 17.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 19.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    TSLA
    Valuation
    $725.31M
    Free Cash Flow
    $5.25B
    12.24%
    FCF Yield
    0.36%
    16.72
    Trailing P/E
    358.55
    8.07
    Forward P/E
    154.15
    Quality & Moat
    13.38%
    ROIC
    3.23%
    10.27%
    ROE
    4.47%
    28.88%
    Gross Margin
    19.06%
    1.69
    PEG Ratio
    43.20
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.04
    Debt / Equity
    0.19
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -1.63
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -2.60
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EPAM: 8Ties: 1TSLA: 2
    EPAMTSLA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EPAM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    TSLA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    $-6.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.25B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-7.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TSLA
    $50.04
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $25.92B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.30T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    40.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 40.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $112.33
    Fair Value: $187.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TSLA
    541.1% Overvalued
    Price is 541.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $390.82
    Fair Value: $60.97
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EPAM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

    +1.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -7.9%

    The market implies +1.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -7.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    TSLA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $391?

    +49.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +44.8%

    The market implies +49.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +44.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    78/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    TSLA
    31/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TSLA
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    Insiders 3.2%Institutions 113.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders842
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TSLA
    Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.7%Retail & Other 44.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,238
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $60,000
    SHNAYDER BORIS
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    SOLOMON LAWRENCE F
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    ABRAHAMS GARY C
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    DVORKIN VIKTAR
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $7,499
    @ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $7,499
    @ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TSLA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $999.96M
    MUSK ELON REEVE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $999.96M
    @ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
    GEBBIA JOSEPH
    Director
    $1.03M
    @ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.34M
    SHNAYDER BORIS
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $207.00 · 2025-12-10
    ABRAHAMS GARY C
    Officer
    $107,574
    @ $179.29 · 2025-11-17
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $227,058
    @ $150.27 · 2025-10-21
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
    SHNAYDER BORIS
    Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $183.97 · 2025-05-22
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $199.07 · 2025-03-05
    FEJES BALAZS
    Officer
    $1.08M
    @ $200.00 · 2025-03-04
    PETERSON JASON D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $277,046
    @ $257.00 · 2025-01-27
    PETERSON JASON D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $119,248
    @ $257.00 · 2024-12-11
    DVORKIN VIKTAR
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $256.53 · 2024-12-11
    PETERSON JASON D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $237,000
    @ $237.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TSLA
    3
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $294.75M
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $9.27M
    @ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $899,077
    @ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $10.69M
    @ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $25.61M
    @ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $918,137
    @ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $4.86M
    @ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $732,573
    @ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
    EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
    Director
    $170.64M
    @ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $32.73M
    @ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $30.81M
    @ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $32.10M
    @ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
    MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
    Director
    $13.19M
    @ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $718,111
    @ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $33.67M
    @ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $27.59M
    @ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $43.16M
    @ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $41.16M
    @ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.89M
    @ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $975,015
    @ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $35.25M
    @ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $39.79M
    @ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.48M
    @ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $35.34M
    @ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $34.60M
    @ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.80M
    @ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $15.14M
    @ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $65,867
    @ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $14.60M
    @ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $113,151
    @ $174.35 · 2024-06-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $17.32M
    @ $184.86 · 2024-05-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(22/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TSLA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (22)
    TSLA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    View EPAM Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis
    EPAM vs TSLA: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io