Compare StocksEPAM vs PFE

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, EPAM is undervalued at $77, with a DCF intrinsic value of $224 and a margin of safety of 66%. PFE is overvalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, EPAM has the wider margin of safety.

EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
$76.64
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$25.21

Rewards

EPAM
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.2x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

EPAM
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.21 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EPAM
PFE
Valuation
$692.90M
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
17.31%
FCF Yield
8.61%
11.01
Trailing P/E
19.24
5.43
Forward P/E
8.91
Quality & Moat
11.22%
ROIC
10.19%
10.93%
ROE
8.31%
29.05%
Gross Margin
74.80%
0.48
PEG Ratio
13.77
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.02
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
0.00%
Dividend Yield
6.61%
EPAM: 8Ties: 1PFE: 3
EPAMPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EPAM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EPAM
$-6.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.25B
Δ Market Cap
$-7.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EPAM
65.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $76.64
Fair Value: $223.85
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
12.3% Overvalued
Price is 12.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.21
Fair Value: $22.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EPAM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $77?

-8.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -13.1%

The market implies -8.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -13.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

+5.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EPAM
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EPAM
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EPAM
Insiders 3.2%Institutions 118.1%
No. of Institutional Holders794
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 30.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,744
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EPAM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $60,000
SHNAYDER BORIS
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
SOLOMON LAWRENCE F
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
ABRAHAMS GARY C
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
DVORKIN VIKTAR
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$7,499
@ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$7,499
@ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EPAM
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.41M
SHNAYDER BORIS
Officer
$1.03M
@ $207.00 · 2025-12-10
ABRAHAMS GARY C
Officer
$107,574
@ $179.29 · 2025-11-17
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$227,058
@ $150.27 · 2025-10-21
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$1.52M
@ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$1.52M
@ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
SHNAYDER BORIS
Officer
$1.93M
@ $183.97 · 2025-05-22
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$3.58M
@ $199.07 · 2025-03-05
FEJES BALAZS
Officer
$1.08M
@ $200.00 · 2025-03-04
PETERSON JASON D
Chief Financial Officer
$277,046
@ $257.00 · 2025-01-27
PETERSON JASON D
Chief Financial Officer
$119,248
@ $257.00 · 2024-12-11
DVORKIN VIKTAR
Officer
$1.73M
@ $256.53 · 2024-12-11
PETERSON JASON D
Chief Financial Officer
$237,000
@ $237.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EPAM
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(17/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EPAM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (17)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View EPAM Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EPAM vs PFE

Is EPAM Systems, Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, EPAM trades at a 65.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $224 vs. price $77), compared to PFE's -12.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $25).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, EPAM Systems, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

EPAM scores 78/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EPAM scores 7.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, EPAM Systems, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) generates a 17.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Pfizer Inc.'s 8.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, EPAM Systems, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

EPAM earns 11.2% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.