Compare StocksEPAM vs INTC

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
$112.33
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

EPAM
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    EPAM
      INTC
      • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      INTC
      Valuation
      $725.31M
      Free Cash Flow
      $-8.30B
      12.24%
      FCF Yield
      -1.66%
      16.72
      Trailing P/E
      N/A
      8.07
      Forward P/E
      66.78
      Quality & Moat
      13.38%
      ROIC
      1.72%
      10.27%
      ROE
      -0.21%
      28.88%
      Gross Margin
      37.20%
      1.69
      PEG Ratio
      1.36
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.04
      Debt / Equity
      0.36
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      -1.63
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.86
      N/A
      Dividend Yield
      N/A
      EPAM: 7Ties: 1INTC: 2
      EPAMINTC

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      EPAM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      $-6.22
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $1.25B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-7.78B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      40.2% Margin of Safety
      Price is 40.2% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $112.33
      Fair Value: $187.71
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $99.61
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      EPAM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

      +1.4%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -7.9%

      The market implies +1.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding -7.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      INTC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      78/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      -2.58
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      INTC
      -2.59
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      Insiders 3.2%Institutions 113.9%
      No. of Institutional Holders842
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      INTC
      Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,201
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      4
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $60,000
      SHNAYDER BORIS
      Officer
      $15,000
      @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
      SOLOMON LAWRENCE F
      Officer
      $15,000
      @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
      ABRAHAMS GARY C
      Officer
      $15,000
      @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
      DVORKIN VIKTAR
      Officer
      $15,000
      @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
      YEZHKOV SERGEY
      Officer
      $7,499
      @ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
      YEZHKOV SERGEY
      Officer
      $7,499
      @ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      INTC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $249,985
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,946
      @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $6.34M
      SHNAYDER BORIS
      Officer
      $1.03M
      @ $207.00 · 2025-12-10
      ABRAHAMS GARY C
      Officer
      $107,574
      @ $179.29 · 2025-11-17
      YEZHKOV SERGEY
      Officer
      $227,058
      @ $150.27 · 2025-10-21
      YEZHKOV SERGEY
      Officer
      $1.52M
      @ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
      YEZHKOV SERGEY
      Officer
      $1.52M
      @ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
      SHNAYDER BORIS
      Officer
      $1.93M
      @ $183.97 · 2025-05-22
      YEZHKOV SERGEY
      Officer
      $3.58M
      @ $199.07 · 2025-03-05
      FEJES BALAZS
      Officer
      $1.08M
      @ $200.00 · 2025-03-04
      PETERSON JASON D
      Chief Financial Officer
      $277,046
      @ $257.00 · 2025-01-27
      PETERSON JASON D
      Chief Financial Officer
      $119,248
      @ $257.00 · 2024-12-11
      DVORKIN VIKTAR
      Officer
      $1.73M
      @ $256.53 · 2024-12-11
      PETERSON JASON D
      Chief Financial Officer
      $237,000
      @ $237.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      INTC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $981,000
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(22/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(74/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      EPAM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (22)
      INTC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
      View EPAM Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
      EPAM vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io