Compare StocksEPAM vs GS

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)

EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
$112.33
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$923.71

Rewards

EPAM
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • EPAM Systems, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 17.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GS
  • Gross margin of 82.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

EPAM
    GS
    • High leverage (6.79x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $13.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    GS
    Valuation
    $725.31M
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    12.24%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    16.72
    Trailing P/E
    16.86
    8.07
    Forward P/E
    14.13
    Quality & Moat
    13.38%
    ROIC
    1.95%
    10.27%
    ROE
    13.17%
    28.88%
    Gross Margin
    82.27%
    1.69
    PEG Ratio
    0.70
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.04
    Debt / Equity
    6.79
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -1.63
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.95%
    EPAM: 3Ties: 2GS: 3
    EPAMGS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EPAM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    GS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    $-6.22
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.25B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-7.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GS
    $5.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $26.00B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$145.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    40.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 40.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $112.33
    Fair Value: $187.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GS
    62.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 62.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $923.71
    Fair Value: $2479.85
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EPAM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

    +1.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -7.9%

    The market implies +1.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -7.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    GS

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    78/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GS
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GS
    -2.00
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    Insiders 3.2%Institutions 113.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders842
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GS
    Insiders 0.5%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 23.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,722
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $60,000
    SHNAYDER BORIS
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    SOLOMON LAWRENCE F
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    ABRAHAMS GARY C
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    DVORKIN VIKTAR
    Officer
    $15,000
    @ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $7,499
    @ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $7,499
    @ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    HESS JOHN B JR.
    Director
    $2.00M
    @ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
    JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
    Director
    $1.49M
    @ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
    FLAHERTY MARK A
    Director
    $29,545
    @ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.34M
    SHNAYDER BORIS
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $207.00 · 2025-12-10
    ABRAHAMS GARY C
    Officer
    $107,574
    @ $179.29 · 2025-11-17
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $227,058
    @ $150.27 · 2025-10-21
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
    SHNAYDER BORIS
    Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $183.97 · 2025-05-22
    YEZHKOV SERGEY
    Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $199.07 · 2025-03-05
    FEJES BALAZS
    Officer
    $1.08M
    @ $200.00 · 2025-03-04
    PETERSON JASON D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $277,046
    @ $257.00 · 2025-01-27
    PETERSON JASON D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $119,248
    @ $257.00 · 2024-12-11
    DVORKIN VIKTAR
    Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $256.53 · 2024-12-11
    PETERSON JASON D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $237,000
    @ $237.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GS
    3
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $62.06M
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.94M
    @ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $255,387
    @ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $4.49M
    @ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $8.89M
    @ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
    WALDRON JOHN E.
    President
    $13.69M
    @ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.41M
    @ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $4.31M
    @ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.71M
    @ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.04M
    @ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
    GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
    Officer
    $3.31M
    @ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer and Treasurer
    $2.32M
    @ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
    RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
    General Counsel
    $4.76M
    @ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
    HALIO CAREY
    Officer
    $965,120
    @ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $3.06M
    @ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.00M
    @ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
    ROGERS JOHN F W
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
    FREDMAN SHEARA J.
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
    COLEMAN DENIS P.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.67M
    @ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
    VINIAR DAVID A
    Director
    $2.51M
    @ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
    SOLOMON DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $457.32 · 2024-05-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(22/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GS
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(66/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EPAM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (22)
    GS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
    View EPAM Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis