Compare StocksEOG vs INTC

EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
$138.82
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EOG
  • EOG Resources, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 62.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
INTC

    Risks

    EOG
    • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 48% above the historical average of 10.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EOG
    INTC
    Valuation
    $3.45B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    4.58%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    15.22
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    12.26
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    7.78%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    16.69%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    62.02%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.31
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.49
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    2.94%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EOG: 8Ties: 1INTC: 0
    EOGINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EOG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EOG
    $-1.73
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $11.34B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-19.66B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EOG
    11.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 11.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $138.82
    Fair Value: $157.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EOG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $139?

    +9.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EOG
    53/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EOG
    -3.06
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EOG
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 95.2%Retail & Other 4.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,001
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EOG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $755.00
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $755.00
    @ $107.86 · 2025-05-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EOG
    4
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.69M
    JANSSEN ANN D
    Chief Financial Officer
    $348,814
    @ $134.31 · 2026-03-12
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $484,535
    @ $128.39 · 2026-03-03
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $250,000
    @ $125.00 · 2026-02-19
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $211,360
    @ $105.68 · 2025-12-31
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $211,662
    @ $112.05 · 2025-09-30
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $190,657
    @ $119.99 · 2025-08-15
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $472,857
    @ $119.65 · 2025-07-01
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $515,772
    @ $127.76 · 2025-04-01
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $483,560
    @ $120.89 · 2024-12-31
    CLARK JANET F
    Director
    $76,867
    @ $135.33 · 2024-11-19
    DONALDSON MICHAEL P
    General Counsel
    $1.43M
    @ $129.50 · 2024-08-26
    CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
    Director
    $816,405
    @ $125.60 · 2024-08-21
    LEITZELL JEFFREY R
    Chief Operating Officer
    $505,920
    @ $126.48 · 2024-08-09
    YACOB EZRA Y
    Chief Executive Officer
    $611,517
    @ $129.31 · 2024-05-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EOG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EOG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EOG Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis