Compare Stocks › EMR vs TXN

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, EMR is overvalued at $165, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of -24%. TXN is undervalued at $301, with an intrinsic value of $391 and a margin of safety of 23%. Of the two, TXN has the wider margin of safety.

EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$164.94
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$300.84

Rewards

EMR
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.10 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
TXN
  • ★Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

EMR
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 36.1x is 60% above the historical average of 22.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
TXN
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 39.0x is 44% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EMR
TXN
Valuation
$3.71B
Free Cash Flow
$4.78B
4.03%
FCF Yield
1.74%
36.09
Trailing P/E
39.02
22.71
Forward P/E
26.11
Quality & Moat
11.59%
ROIC
23.82%
12.80%
ROE
39.72%
53.16%
Gross Margin
60.24%
1.91
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
0.57
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.51
1.35%
Dividend Yield
2.02%
EMR: 3Ties: 1TXN: 8
EMRTXN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EMR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EMR
$1.29
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$13.89B
Δ Market Cap
+$17.88B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EMR
24.0% Overvalued
Price is 24.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $164.94
Fair Value: $133.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TXN
11.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $300.84
Fair Value: $339.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EMR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $165?

+13.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.3%

The market implies +13.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $301?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.4%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EMR
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EMR
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EMR
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 83.6%Retail & Other 16.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,919
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.9%Retail & Other 7.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,691
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EMR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EMR
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.88M
TRAIN MICHAEL H
Officer
$1.17M
@ $158.99 · 2026-08-06
LEVATICH MATTHEW S
Director
$239,349
@ $162.16 · 2026-02-10
PIAZZA NICHOLAS J
Officer
$1.07M
@ $159.07 · 2026-02-09
BLINN MARK A
Director
$438,930
@ $152.62 · 2026-02-05
KARSANBHAI SURENDRALAL LANCA
Chief Executive Officer
$965,979
@ $133.00 · 2025-12-03
TRAIN MICHAEL H
Officer
$3.38M
@ $119.44 · 2025-05-12
BLINN MARK A
Director
$2,505
@ $125.25 · 2025-02-12
LEVATICH MATTHEW S
Director
$233,472
@ $125.05 · 2025-02-12
BLINN MARK A
Director
$234,701
@ $125.71 · 2025-02-10
TRAIN MICHAEL H
Officer
$2.71M
@ $125.96 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TXN
4
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $119.37M
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.37M
@ $301.56 · 2026-10-27
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.30M
@ $302.46 · 2026-10-27
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$1.83M
@ $302.21 · 2026-10-27
ABRAHAM TSEDENIYA
Officer
$1.85M
@ $264.63 · 2026-08-27
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EMR
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TXN
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EMR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
TXN
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View EMR Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EMR vs TXN

Is Emerson Electric Co. or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TXN trades at a 23.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $391 vs. price $301), compared to EMR's -24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $133 vs. $165).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Emerson Electric Co. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

EMR scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Emerson Electric Co. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) generates a 4.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 1.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Emerson Electric Co. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

TXN earns 23.8% ROIC versus EMR's 11.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Emerson Electric Co.'s or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?▼

EMR's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). EMR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

EMR vs TXN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io