Compare Stocks › EME vs ORCL

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, EME is undervalued at $680, with a DCF intrinsic value of $930 and a margin of safety of 27%. ORCL is undervalued at $131, with an intrinsic value of $385 and a margin of safety of 66%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$679.55
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$130.67

Rewards

EME
  • ★EMCOR Group, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★EMCOR Group, Inc. scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 38.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
ORCL
  • ★Gross margin of 64.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

EME
  • ⚠Gross margin of 19.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
ORCL
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠High leverage (1.97x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.57 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
EME
ORCL
Valuation
$1.29B
Free Cash Flow
$-45.85B
4.32%
FCF Yield
-11.58%
19.65
Trailing P/E
20.48
17.21
Forward P/E
11.84
Quality & Moat
33.86%
ROIC
8.55%
40.55%
ROE
41.19%
19.59%
Gross Margin
63.96%
1.45
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.97
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.84
0.24%
Dividend Yield
1.53%
EME: 5Ties: 3ORCL: 4
EMEORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
EME

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
EME
$7.23
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.79B
Δ Market Cap
+$20.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$3.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$90.30B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
EME
27.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 27.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $679.55
Fair Value: $930.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
66.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 66.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $130.67
Fair Value: $384.55
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
EME

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $680?

+9.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +9.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
EME
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
EME
-2.30
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
EME
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,709
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 38.4%Institutions 43.5%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,494
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
EME
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2,300
MCEVOY MICHAEL KEVIN
Director
$2,300
@ $766.67 · 2026-09-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.48M
RUSCKOWSKI STEPHEN H
Director
$3.48M
@ $139.35 · 2026-09-29
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
EME
0
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.82M
LOWE CAROL P
Director
$802,275
@ $844.50 · 2026-06-17
REID WILLIAM P
Director
$1.85M
@ $925.78 · 2026-05-11
ALTMEYER JOHN W
Director
$2.24M
@ $895.00 · 2026-05-01
SCHWARZWAELDER STEVEN
Director
$5.01M
@ $895.19 · 2026-04-30
NALBANDIAN JASON R.
Chief Financial Officer
$685,144
@ $856.43 · 2026-04-30
LIND ROBERT PETER
Officer
$603,632
@ $894.27 · 2026-04-30
GUZZI ANTHONY J
President
$26.26M
@ $729.48 · 2026-03-05
MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
General Counsel
$2.47M
@ $735.00 · 2026-03-02
WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
Director
$897,316
@ $677.22 · 2025-11-03
NALBANDIAN JASON R.
Chief Financial Officer
$364,155
@ $485.54 · 2025-06-06
LIND ROBERT PETER
Officer
$216,960
@ $485.37 · 2025-06-06
GUZZI ANTHONY J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $436.03 · 2025-05-05
WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
Director
$390,950
@ $412.83 · 2025-05-01
MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
General Counsel
$462,588
@ $370.07 · 2025-03-13
ALTMEYER JOHN W
Director
$809,900
@ $404.95 · 2025-02-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
3
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $85.34M
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$399,123
@ $151.70 · 2026-09-22
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Chief Executive Officer
$3.42M
@ $151.59 · 2026-09-22
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $139.94 · 2026-09-16
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
EME
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
EME
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
ORCL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View EME Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: EME vs ORCL

Is EMCOR Group, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 66.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $385 vs. price $131), compared to EME's 27.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $930 vs. $680).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, EMCOR Group, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?▼

EME scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?▼

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EME scores 6.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, EMCOR Group, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?▼

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) generates a 4.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -11.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, EMCOR Group, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?▼

EME earns 33.9% ROIC versus ORCL's 8.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, EMCOR Group, Inc.'s or Oracle Corporation's?▼

EME's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). EME has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

EME vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io