Compare StocksEME vs INTC

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$751.33
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EME
  • EMCOR Group, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • EMCOR Group, Inc. scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 38.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC

    Risks

    EME
    • Gross margin of 19.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 26.7x is 39% above the historical average of 19.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EME
    INTC
    Valuation
    $991.14M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    2.95%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    26.67
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    23.80
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    30.73%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    34.63%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    19.33%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    0.50
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.13
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.36
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    0.21%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EME: 7Ties: 1INTC: 1
    EMEINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EME

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EME
    $7.23
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.79B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$20.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EME
    3.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 3.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $751.33
    Fair Value: $774.63
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EME

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $751?

    +11.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.7%

    The market implies +11.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EME
    86/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EME
    -2.30
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EME
    Insiders 1.3%Institutions 98.0%Retail & Other 0.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,493
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EME
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    LIND ROBERT PETER
    Officer
    $603.00
    @ $603.00 · 2024-04-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EME
    2
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.65M
    GUZZI ANTHONY J
    President
    $26.26M
    @ $729.48 · 2026-03-05
    MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
    General Counsel
    $2.47M
    @ $735.00 · 2026-03-02
    WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
    Director
    $897,316
    @ $677.22 · 2025-11-03
    NALBANDIAN JASON R.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $364,155
    @ $485.54 · 2025-06-06
    LIND ROBERT PETER
    Officer
    $216,960
    @ $485.37 · 2025-06-06
    GUZZI ANTHONY J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $436.03 · 2025-05-05
    WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
    Director
    $390,950
    @ $412.83 · 2025-05-01
    MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
    General Counsel
    $462,588
    @ $370.07 · 2025-03-13
    ALTMEYER JOHN W
    Director
    $809,900
    @ $404.95 · 2025-02-28
    WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
    Director
    $482,027
    @ $370.79 · 2024-07-29
    LOWE CAROL P
    Director
    $465,916
    @ $374.23 · 2024-06-06
    MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
    General Counsel
    $1.80M
    @ $389.58 · 2024-05-22
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EME
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EME
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EME Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io