Compare Stocks › ELV vs NOW

Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV) vs ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ELV is fairly valued at $420, with a DCF intrinsic value of $515 and a margin of safety of 18%. NOW is overvalued at $105, with an intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of -38%. Of the two, ELV has the wider margin of safety.

ELV
Elevance Health, Inc.
$420.07
VS
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$105.12

Rewards

ELV
  • ★Elevance Health, Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.8% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
NOW
  • ★Gross margin of 73.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

ELV
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 24.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
NOW
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ELV
NOW
Valuation
$7.99B
Free Cash Flow
$5.75B
8.77%
FCF Yield
5.27%
17.84
Trailing P/E
75.63
13.87
Forward P/E
21.89
Quality & Moat
8.90%
ROIC
9.85%
11.48%
ROE
11.85%
26.43%
Gross Margin
73.08%
1.29
PEG Ratio
0.76
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.29
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.81
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.18
1.64%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
ELV: 7Ties: 2NOW: 3
ELVNOW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ELV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ELV
$-3.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$13.20B
Δ Market Cap
$-44.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ELV
18.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $420.07
Fair Value: $515.05
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NOW
38.4% Overvalued
Price is 38.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.12
Fair Value: $75.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ELV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $420?

+2.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -1.1%

The market implies +2.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $105?

+23.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.4%

The market implies +23.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ELV
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ELV
-2.21
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ELV
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.7%Retail & Other 5.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,185
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,205
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ELV
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.24M
PERU RAMIRO G
Director
$366,050
@ $366.05 · 2026-07-17
BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $367.79 · 2026-07-17
COLLIS STEVEN HOWARD
Director
$869,520
@ $289.84 · 2026-03-05
DEVORE SUSAN D
Director
$374,580
@ $312.15 · 2025-08-19
BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $286.94 · 2025-07-18
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ELV
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.74M
PENCZEK RONALD W
Officer
$148,766
@ $403.16 · 2026-06-12
DIXON ROBERT L JR
Director
$60,667
@ $401.77 · 2026-06-11
PENCZEK RONALD W
Officer
$617,192
@ $403.13 · 2026-05-19
SCHULMAN AMY W.
Director
$7,475
@ $287.50 · 2026-03-12
KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
Officer
$910,604
@ $284.92 · 2026-03-06
KAYE MARK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.95M
@ $424.82 · 2025-04-24
PENCZEK RONALD W
Officer
$183,903
@ $415.13 · 2025-03-10
KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
President
$1.39M
@ $396.30 · 2025-03-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NOW
4
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.26M
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$300,777
@ $147.87 · 2026-08-31
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.08M
@ $138.00 · 2026-08-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$365,851
@ $135.50 · 2026-08-27
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$188,400
@ $125.60 · 2026-08-13
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ELV
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NOW
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ELV
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
NOW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View ELV Full AnalysisView NOW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ELV vs NOW

Is Elevance Health, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ELV trades at a 18.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $515 vs. price $420), compared to NOW's -38.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $76 vs. $105).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Elevance Health, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?▼

ELV scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Elevance Health, Inc. in financial distress?▼

ELV's Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NOW scores 8.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Elevance Health, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?▼

Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV) generates a 8.8% free cash flow yield, compared to ServiceNow, Inc.'s 5.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Elevance Health, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?▼

NOW earns 9.9% ROIC versus ELV's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

ELV vs NOW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io