Compare StocksELV vs INTC

Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ELV is undervalued at $389, with a DCF intrinsic value of $662 and a margin of safety of 41%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, ELV has the wider margin of safety.

ELV
Elevance Health, Inc.
$388.50
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Rewards

ELV
  • Elevance Health, Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
INTC

    Risks

    ELV
    • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 24.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ELV
    INTC
    Valuation
    $4.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    5.10%
    FCF Yield
    -1.23%
    16.47
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    13.28
    Forward P/E
    86.70
    Quality & Moat
    11.06%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    12.09%
    ROE
    -2.91%
    25.89%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.46
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.10
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.61
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    1.73%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    ELV: 8Ties: 1INTC: 2
    ELVINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ELV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ELV
    $-3.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $13.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-44.69B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ELV
    41.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $388.50
    Fair Value: $661.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ELV

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $389?

    +1.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.6%

    The market implies +1.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ELV
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ELV
    -2.21
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ELV
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.4%Retail & Other 6.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,005
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ELV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.68M
    COLLIS STEVEN H
    Director
    $869,520
    @ $289.84 · 2026-03-05
    DEVORE SUSAN D
    Director
    $374,580
    @ $312.15 · 2025-08-19
    BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $286.94 · 2025-07-18
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ELV
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.74M
    PENCZEK RONALD W
    Officer
    $148,766
    @ $403.16 · 2026-06-12
    DIXON ROBERT L JR
    Director
    $60,667
    @ $401.77 · 2026-06-11
    PENCZEK RONALD W
    Officer
    $617,192
    @ $403.13 · 2026-05-19
    SCHULMAN AMY W.
    Director
    $7,475
    @ $287.50 · 2026-03-12
    KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
    Officer
    $910,604
    @ $284.92 · 2026-03-06
    KAYE MARK
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $424.82 · 2025-04-24
    PENCZEK RONALD W
    Officer
    $183,903
    @ $415.13 · 2025-03-10
    KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
    President
    $1.39M
    @ $396.30 · 2025-03-05
    KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $432.14 · 2024-10-18
    PERU RAMIRO G
    Director
    $400,235
    @ $531.52 · 2024-08-05
    BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.03M
    @ $500.98 · 2024-07-22
    DIXON ROBERT L JR
    Director
    $154,562
    @ $506.76 · 2024-07-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ELV
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ELV
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View ELV Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ELV vs INTC

    Is Elevance Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ELV trades at a 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $662 vs. price $389), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Elevance Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    ELV scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ELV scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Elevance Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV) generates a 5.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Elevance Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    ELV earns 11.1% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.