Compare Stocks › ELV vs GOOGL

Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, ELV is fairly valued at $420, with a DCF intrinsic value of $515 and a margin of safety of 18%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, ELV has the wider margin of safety.

ELV
Elevance Health, Inc.
$420.07
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

ELV
  • ★Elevance Health, Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.8% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ELV
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 24.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ELV
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $7.99B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    8.77%
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    17.84
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    13.87
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    8.90%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    11.48%
    ROE
    44.29%
    26.43%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    1.29
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.81
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    1.64%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    ELV: 5Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
    ELVGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ELV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ELV
    $-3.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $13.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-44.69B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ELV
    18.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 18.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $420.07
    Fair Value: $515.05
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ELV

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $420?

    +2.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.1%

    The market implies +2.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ELV
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ELV
    -2.21
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ELV
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.7%Retail & Other 5.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,185
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ELV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.24M
    PERU RAMIRO G
    Director
    $366,050
    @ $366.05 · 2026-07-17
    BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $367.79 · 2026-07-17
    COLLIS STEVEN HOWARD
    Director
    $869,520
    @ $289.84 · 2026-03-05
    DEVORE SUSAN D
    Director
    $374,580
    @ $312.15 · 2025-08-19
    BOUDREAUX GAIL A KOZIARA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $286.94 · 2025-07-18
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ELV
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.74M
    PENCZEK RONALD W
    Officer
    $148,766
    @ $403.16 · 2026-06-12
    DIXON ROBERT L JR
    Director
    $60,667
    @ $401.77 · 2026-06-11
    PENCZEK RONALD W
    Officer
    $617,192
    @ $403.13 · 2026-05-19
    SCHULMAN AMY W.
    Director
    $7,475
    @ $287.50 · 2026-03-12
    KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
    Officer
    $910,604
    @ $284.92 · 2026-03-06
    KAYE MARK
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $424.82 · 2025-04-24
    PENCZEK RONALD W
    Officer
    $183,903
    @ $415.13 · 2025-03-10
    KENDRICK CHARLES MORGAN JR
    President
    $1.39M
    @ $396.30 · 2025-03-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ELV
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ELV
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View ELV Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ELV vs GOOGL

    Is Elevance Health, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ELV trades at a 18.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $515 vs. price $420), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Elevance Health, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    ELV scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ELV scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Elevance Health, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    Elevance Health, Inc. (ELV) generates a 8.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Elevance Health, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus ELV's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Elevance Health, Inc.'s or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    ELV's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). ELV has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    ELV vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io