SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › EL vs INTC

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

EL
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
$85.60
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

EL
  • ★Gross margin of 74.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
INTC

    Risks

    EL
    • ⚠ROIC has declined by 14.4 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    INTC
    • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    EL
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.70B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    5.47%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    28.23
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    12.31%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    -28.11%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    74.32%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    2.33
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    1.64%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    EL: 5Ties: 1INTC: 3
    ELINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    EL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    EL
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-2.23B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-50.91B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    EL
    73.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 73.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $85.60
    Fair Value: $323.24
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    EL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $86?

    +9.0%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    EL
    36/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    EL
    -3.21
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    EL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 95.9%Retail & Other 2.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,345
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,154
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    EL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $2.96M
    @ $65.00 · 2025-02-07
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $5.72M
    @ $65.80 · 2025-02-06
    SHRIVASTAVA AKHIL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $46,053
    @ $65.79 · 2025-02-05
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $5.02M
    @ $64.48 · 2024-11-19
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $9.86M
    @ $64.46 · 2024-11-18
    SHRIVASTAVA AKHIL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $65,000
    @ $65.00 · 2024-11-14
    FRIBOURG PAUL J
    Director
    $10.05M
    @ $63.98 · 2024-11-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    EL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.02B
    LA LANDE RASHIDA K
    General Counsel
    $151,498
    @ $94.45 · 2025-11-26
    LAUDER JANE A
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $1.68M
    @ $94.38 · 2025-11-26
    WEBSTER MERIDITH P
    Officer
    $476,971
    @ $87.84 · 2025-11-18
    STERNLICHT BARRY S
    Director
    $364,749
    @ $91.83 · 2025-11-11
    LAL 2015 ELF TRUST
    Trustee
    $508.60M
    @ $89.70 · 2025-11-06
    EVELYN H. LAUDER 2012 MARITAL TRUST TWO
    Trustee
    $255.22M
    @ $89.70 · 2025-11-06
    LEONARD A LAUDER 2013 REVOCABLE TRUST
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $249.91M
    @ $89.70 · 2025-11-06
    FORESTER LYNN
    Director
    $339,288
    @ $91.65 · 2025-08-29
    LA LANDE RASHIDA K
    General Counsel
    $589,594
    @ $91.88 · 2025-08-28
    LAUDER JANE A
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $1.39M
    @ $88.23 · 2025-08-21
    FREDA FABRIZIO
    Chief Executive Officer
    $743,259
    @ $67.76 · 2024-11-01
    FORESTER LYNN
    Director
    $364,143
    @ $93.61 · 2024-08-23
    LAUDER JANE A
    Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
    $1.82M
    @ $121.26 · 2024-05-30
    JUEPTNER PETER
    Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $130.62 · 2024-05-22
    TRAVIS TRACEY THOMAS
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $135.73 · 2024-05-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    EL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    EL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    INTC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View EL Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) vs Intel Corporation (INTC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io